Australia's censorship scheme to be reviewed

By John Hilvert on Dec 14, 2010 9:21 AM
Filed under Networking

As online games are subject to interim "solutions".

The Federal Government has asked the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) to review the National Classification System "to accommodate and better anticipate technological and other development".

The surprise review of Australia's censorship system was one of several decisions announced following the second meeting of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (SCAG) for 2010 held in Canberra last Friday.

Ministers agreed that an ALRC review of the National Classification Scheme include consideration of classification categories, including the content of the RC (Refused Classification) category for films, computer games and publications.

ALRC reviews can take up two years to complete. It was unclear what impact the agreement might have on further extending the Government's foreshadowed RC review for the purposes of mandatory ISP filtering, which was estimated to have slipped to mid-2013 prior to the ALRC review being proposed.

In the meantime, Ministers called for their officers to urgently develop "alternative options" for all online computer games, including mobile phone applications.

SCAG also endorsed "model provisions" for Federal and State laws to allow academic research of restricted material (including material classified RC Refused Classification). This issue was raised in the redacted version of the incoming portfolio brief for Communications Minister, Senator Conroy reported on 17 November.

The brief had noted that a review by an independent expert on the process of compiling a black list can only be done as long as "the independent expert does not view the actual child abuse material."

A legislative amendment "would be required to provide the independent expert with immunity from criminal proceedings in relation to access of child abuse material, and also to be given standing to seek review of Classification decisions."

SCAG also decided amendments for such academic pursuits were "a matter for each jurisdiction."

Australia's censorship scheme to be reviewed

6 comments in this discussion

"@Ezy maybe he thinks they can use BSD'd FBI backdoor to check what you're sending."

By longsword

Tags

censorship, alrc, classification, law reform commission, r18, netfilter

Google sees spike in govt removal requests

Tim Berners-Lee calls data retention a 'really, really bad idea'

Pirate Party wins right to contest federal election

Chinese Government tightens Internet controls

Breaking Stories

Aussie retailers falling behind on 'couch commerce'

eHealth measures missing the point

Microsoft adds Azure sub-regions in NSW and VIC

Rio Tinto scales BYOD to 4000 users

Carriers attack NBN Co's 'lack of urgency'

Comments: 6

longsword Dec 14, 2010 12:48 PM	good luck classifying online games unles you're going to add them all to the filter and block them conboy
anonymous Dec 15, 2010 9:07 AM	Don't encourage him, longsword. ;-) Conboy and his holy "stakeholders" are quite capable of screwing up everything possible relating to imposing secret government censorship on the Internet. In fact, "too much censorship is never enough." Where are you, Roy and HG, when we need you to puncture the egos of these pretentious and pompous pissants?
btone Dec 15, 2010 11:56 AM	Ah yes, but the AG, Conroy and co. now risk the wrath of an even more formidable gang of revolutionaries than 'Anonymous'...the WOW suburban mum gankers!
longsword Dec 20, 2010 11:37 AM	LOL @BTONE, imagine the outcry if WOW speeds got affected or god forbid even blocked.
Ezy2Confuze Dec 21, 2010 1:30 PM	I'm surprised that Conboy and his Holy Goons haven't tried to sneak in a law making the use of Private VPN's illegal for everyone except corporations, unless you put in a request to a specific Govt. Department detailing why you need such a facility.
longsword Dec 21, 2010 2:28 PM	@Ezy maybe he thinks they can use BSD'd FBI backdoor to check what you're sending.