Anonymous hackers could face 10 years in prison

 

Parliamentary DDoS offenders warned.

Hackers involved in launching distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks on parliamentary websites in February could face maximum penalties of 10 years imprisonment, the Federal Police has warned.

So far, two hackers have been linked to the two-day long attacks, which were orchestrated by the online 'Anonymous' community to protest the Labor Government's mandatory ISP filtering proposal.

A Federal Police spokesman would not disclose its methods, saying only that its High Tech Crime Investigations unit "proactively investigates individuals or groups seeking to commit serious computer intrusion offences or denial of service attacks".

The unit worked "very closely" with Australian and international law enforcement counterparts, she told iTnews.

"Potential offenders should consider the consequences if they are criminally prosecuted for taking part in, or inciting, electronic attacks," she said.

"As legislated, DDoS attacks attack a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment."

Victorian student Steve Slayo last week pled guilty to four charges in relation to the attacks, which took place on February 10 and 11.

He was to be sentenced this month by Magistrate Donna Bakos of the Melbourne Magistrates Court, the Sydney Morning Herald reported.

In October, 22-year-old Matthew Gordon George was fined $550 in the Newcastle Local Court for his involvement in the attacks.

Although Labor's filtering proposal was criticised by the Greens, the Australian Sex Party, Electronic Frontiers Australia and certain ISPs, there was little mainstream support for Anonymous' methods.

EFA stated in February that the DDoS attacks "[damaged] the cause by playing to stereotypes of filter opponents as juveniles motivated by a desire to keep the internet safe for porn".

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Anonymous hackers could face 10 years in prison
"Get a life guys, the one perp was fined $550... How any of you compare that with rape and murder convictions is a mind boggler boys... As for our justice system it's true that many sentences are ..."
By Maxxi2
 
 
 
Comments: 9
Anon59
Dec 3, 2010 1:47 PM
And yet rapists routinely get four to seven year sentences in Australia.

DDoS a government website? 10 years!
Rape someone? 4.5 years!
Rape someone SEVEN TIMES? 6 years!

Well done, Australian justice system.
Res
Dec 3, 2010 3:02 PM
@Anon59

Actually, its for attacking any server on any network in AU, not limited to Govt.

But yes, I know where you are coming from, there is something very wrong when people who do things like this, get 3 times the incarceration period as those who cause serious harm to another person through assault, rape, even manslaughter .

Not saying they deserve less than 10 years, but it shows how pathetic the courts are when sentencing in crimes again a person.

It is nice to know that my individual HP servers are each singular worth more than my life *sigh*
Ace
Dec 3, 2010 3:11 PM
A little off the mark @Anon59. You'll be pleased to know the maximum sentence for rape is actually 20 years (not 4.5 or 6).
DanielBrown
Dec 3, 2010 3:41 PM
@Ace... Maximum Yes, average no.
Ace
Dec 3, 2010 4:33 PM
Yes, well I'm sure the 'average' DDOSer will get a slap on the wrist and $500 fine. Not 10 years.
Hyperion09
Dec 3, 2010 10:59 PM
"Well done, Australian justice system."

They're being bought off by corrupt politicians, is it really that surprising?
mad1k5
Dec 4, 2010 8:35 PM
Yeah our justice system sucks, but hackers shouldn't DDos websites anyway.
Johnny
Dec 5, 2010 11:29 AM
I dont have any idea how a court could prove beyond reasonable doubt that somebody was "DDOSING" a website.

All you'd say is you were visiting the website and that you were not launching a DDOS attack on it and theres your reasonable doubt.
Maxxi2
Dec 5, 2010 12:09 PM
Get a life guys, the one perp was fined $550... How any of you compare that with rape and murder convictions is a mind boggler boys...

As for our justice system it's true that many sentences are either too light or appear too light, and it is far from perfect, but still one of the most balanced and fairest on the planet.

We are still better off than most, but not all.

DDOSing is today's form of the 1960s/1970s rampaging on the streets in masks, torching any cars and smashing any shop, business and house windows that they could get to.

Back then it was discovered that this violent protester segment were primarily radical elements that rarely had the interests of the true protest community and actions at heart, were mostly anarchists or simply violent in nature and sought easy outlets for their rage at life in general.

None of them ever really helped the protest movement achieve their goals, but they did give the govts and police justification to significantly ramp up their police spending, hardline police methods, control orders, surveillance activities, agents numbers and court co-operation.

200,000 peaceful protesters on a march made an impact 100 times greater and actually got things changed...

@Johnny - I am pretty certain that the AFP electronic forensics folks can identify the somewhat obvious patterns of a DDOS and/or track the triggering or management of this to perps...

"Yes sir, I was just visiting that website, 12,000 times per second... Honest!"

Edited by Maxxi2: 5/12/2010 12:13:33 PM
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote