WikiLeaks suffers DDoS attack

 

Attacked after leaking fresh round of documents.

WikiLeaks claims it has come under a "mass" cyber attack just moments after it leaked 250,000 US embassy documents to media outlets across the globe.

"We are currently under a mass distributed denial of service attack," the group posted on its Twitter page on Sunday night.

Papers reported to have received the documents included Spain's El Pais, France's Le Monde, Germany's Der Speigel, the UK's Guardian, and The New York Times.

According to a report by The Guardian, the cables detailed Washington's fears over Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, speculation about Russian government links to crime gangs, harsh criticisms of the UK's Afghanistan war efforts and alleged "inappropriate behaviour" by a member of the British royal family.

The idea of launching a sustained cyber attack on the web site had previously been flagged in the United States.

Washington Times editorial published after WikiLeaks' prior Afghanistan leak suggested that such an attack would solve the WikiLeaks problem, while a Fox News columnist wanted the US government to launch an "electronic assault" on the site and its ISP to prevent it from further releases.

Security researcher Mikko Hyponnen noted on his Twitter feed at 6:50am this morning (Sydney time) that the Wikileaks site had been down for several hours after the release of the documents, but had resurfaced at an IP address that he believed was hosted at Amazon's EC2.

"So it's in the U.S.A.," he noted.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


WikiLeaks suffers DDoS attack
"So @Res, in your opinion, the military should publish it's plans, because no-one here would tell the Taliban? Seems a little idealistic to me, or perhaps I'm just a little cynical. I'm sure ..."
By Ace
 
 
 
Comments: 4
meski
Nov 29, 2010 11:00 AM
And a DDOS attack is different in some way from many many people accessing their site? Cheers, WikiLeaks, you've just been SlashDotted.
BrettWinterford
Nov 29, 2010 11:30 AM
@meski - LOL.
I believe this guy - http://twitter.com/#!/th3j35t3r - begs to differ.
Res
Nov 29, 2010 12:04 PM
Endangering lives or scared crapless of truth coming out that Govts do not want us all to know about...

The last WL "release" was touted as endangering lives, but was proven false by security orgs in AU, was it not...

If Governments don't want us knowing their secrets they shouldn't commit such acts.

And what's a secret anyway, we put these morons in power to run the country for us, therefor there should be NO secrets from the Govt to its people.
Ace
Nov 29, 2010 12:38 PM
So @Res, in your opinion, the military should publish it's plans, because no-one here would tell the Taliban? Seems a little idealistic to me, or perhaps I'm just a little cynical.

I'm sure Medicare has a lot of information about you. Should they publish that? Obviously we depend heavily upon governments keeping secrets. You cannot know which bit of information is going to complete a puzzle for less-than-friendly government, so you can never 'prove false' the danger of leaking secret information. It's not like they're going to jump up and yell 'bingo!'. They'll save it for a rainy day. Wouldn't you?
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 507

Vote