Customs blocks blogs despite Gov2.0 promises

 

Fears network security risks.

The Australian Customs and Border Protection Service has blocked employee access to blogs, for fear of what security threats such sites could pose to its network.

The agency was questioned last week by Open Australia Foundation founder Matthew Landauer, who believed his site to have been mistakenly blocked.

Landauer was advised that both the parliamentary reference site and blog were classified by the agency's third-party filtering software as "blogs".

"The Australian Customs and Border Protection does not allow general access to websites classified as 'blogs' at the present time, due to the threat websites within this category can pose to the security of the Australian Customs and Border Protection network," the agency reportedly advised.

"It is important to note that the filter list is provided by a third party and the Australian Customs and Border Protection service simply consumes this list. We do not make decisions on what category a website should be placed in."

An agency spokesman told iTnews that its blacklist was devised by a contracted service provider, and staff could access filtered websites on request, as long as they had a business requirement to do so.

The spokesman did not disclose which security vendor or product was used.

Blogs and Gov2.0

Earlier this year, Australian Government Information Management Office CIO Ann Steward said the Government would encourage public servants to engage online.

The Federal Government's 'Declaration of Open Government' promised "a culture of engagement, built on better access to and use of government held information, and sustained by the innovative use of technology".

Agencies were directed to "reduce barriers to online engagement, undertake social networking, crowd sourcing and online collaboration projects and support online engagement by employees, in accordance with the Australian Public Service Commission Guidelines".

Steward expected agencies to develop their own Gov2.0 and social media strategies by May 2011.

AGIMO, the Department of Innovation, Australian Public Service Commission and Labor Party have introduced blogs on their websites.

The Customs and Border Protection spokesman said it was in the process of developing a Social Networking policy "to identify and address social networking requirements".

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Customs blocks blogs despite Gov2.0 promises
"Why is it people always complain about Government departments not having access to something but as soon as they get access everyone complains about public servants wasting their money. I also ..."
By Xar
 
 
 
Comments: 4
pameacs
Nov 1, 2010 2:39 PM
It really shows the dated and out of touch management of the Customs and Border Protection. Block all blogs and only allow access to those that are deemed to have a work related function. That can take forever in some places to get those exceptions approved and often there is great technical help on many. Not just in the IT roles. Many other departments gain from the discussions out there. Sure there is a lot of crap but there is so much good in many blogs out there. To say they are added as a default because they are dangerous shows the lack of understanding the web IMHO. The only people I know who have found blogs dangerous are incompetent or dubious governments.
TheAdvisor
Nov 1, 2010 4:27 PM
Looking at it from a sysadmin or more netadmin point of view security wise yes block all non essential traffic that be rule no1 of most places serious about security.

If these people are at work they have no need to be using work computers for "social networking".

They can use they're own stuff in they're own time.

Ooo i'd make manager of the year award not :)

Point being network security dictates that non essential traffic can result in redirects hijacking and so on.

Apart from that it chews extra bandwidth.

Oooo Heee Hooo nup sorry but work computers are just that
unless work requires it why risk it.

Classic example any website gets high jacked say like wifi users at hotspots suffer.

Thats how easy it is to be gotten before you know it
a nasty piece of malwares on your system.

To late.

Not good that's why companies are being so strict.

Last thing they need is info being gleemd or any other
malicous activity occur.

Security is a must that much i did learn for mcsa.

Ezy2Confuze
Nov 1, 2010 6:50 PM
I honestly don't see what the fuss is about, most workplaces have no need to be viewing blog posts, execpt for ICt people in general.

In our case, we have dedicated "netcafe" PC's for staff to use, with full outside access.

I've lost count of the number of hours I've spent blocking individual's from viewing sites because they have nothing to do with that persons job role. We pay people to work, they have web connected smart phones and internet connections at home they can do their personal browsing on.

After the recent issue with Facebook ads re-directing people to hard core porn sites, we are looking at whether to start blocking social networking sites, except for LinkedIn, which we see more as a business tool than Facebook
Xar
Nov 2, 2010 1:29 PM
Why is it people always complain about Government departments not having access to something but as soon as they get access everyone complains about public servants wasting their money.

I also find it interesting both this website and the OpenAustralia website fail to protect users login information.

Ever notice how the login button submits your username and password using http and not https defying even the most basic website security 101 checklist.


Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 500

Vote