Union rallies over ATO 'broadcast email'

 

Delegate berated for sending unsolicited messages.

The Community and Public Sector Union will meet in Adelaide this week to protest Australian Taxation Office (ATO) policy that disallows union delegates from sending unsolicited email to other staff.

Union members planned to meet outside the ATO's Waymouth Street office to support Alan Hixson, who had been disciplined by the ATO for sending an email to 30 staff.

The message (pdf), sent on 19 October, invited staff to attend lunchtime union meetings about public service bargaining arrangements.

It was deemed a 'blanket or broadcast email' that contravened ATO policy, and resulted in a Formal Written Direction and Formal Written Warning being issued to Hixson.

An ATO spokesman said its Employee Consultative Representative Framework disallowed union delegates from sending "unsolicited emails to ATO employees who are not union members or who have not notified the union they want to receive material from them".

"If an ATO employee is not complying with any policy whatever it covers, or has indicated they do not intend to comply with any policy, we will issue them with a direction to follow the policy.

"If they still contravene our policy after they have specifically been directed not to, we can take conduct action."

The spokesman noted that the ATO Employee Consultative Representative Framework had been developed in consultation with unions.

But the union argued that it did not comply with the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Gillard Government's policy on public sector industrial relations.

In a letter (pdf) to ATO Commissioner Michael D'Ascenzo dated 21 October, union deputy secretary Rupert Evans required the ATO to withdraw the warnings issued to Hixson within three days.

Evans branded the ATO's action against Hixson as "unlawful, discriminatory and unacceptable". iTnews was unable to reach him for further comment.

The rally would take place today at 12.30pm.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Union rallies over ATO 'broadcast email'
"I guess without knowing what was in the email, we will never know who is in the right, however the law does state that no-one can force you to join a Union, if this guy was trying o do that in any ..."
By Ezy2Confuze
 
 
 
Comments: 5
Res
Oct 28, 2010 10:02 AM
"An ATO spokesman said its Employee Consultative Representative Framework disallowed union delegates from sending "unsolicited emails to ATO employees who are not union members or who have not notified the union they want to receive material from them"."

-And so it should, else it is SPAM, why do union terrorist orgs think they are above company policies, and nor importantly, the LAW?

"Fair Work Act 2009 and the Gillard Government's policy on public sector industrial relations."

- So, Gillard policy is it's OK to spam? I thought she was a lawyer, looks like she dropped out early, since the spam act was law in 2003.

Oh and for the record, I am appalled that my tax dollars, contribute to hardware and software resources being ABUSED
by others, I don't want my tax dollars providing unions with squat.
btone
Oct 28, 2010 10:46 AM
"union terrorist orgs"

As opposed to vigilante fascist orgs like the tea party droogies with secret funding by billionaires they don't even know about?

Grow up, read some history and be grateful previous generations fought for the working conditions your heroes are ripping to shreds these days.
Tom Brown
Oct 28, 2010 1:14 PM
Yes, I wonder if you were the grande PooBah of the KKK working for the ATO If you would be desclipined for letting your chapter know about a meetiing, or maybe a mormon letting their fellows know about a suburb blitz.
But then to the last government the word Union was tantamount to terroristt!

A little aside, when Menzies was Prime minister and Australia was calling for (paid) migrants from the UK a question was asked of the applicants if they were ever part of, involved with or had associations with any unions. If their answer was yes they were not accepted.
saintlysoft
Oct 28, 2010 1:50 PM
Tom, you've missed the key point in the article that it was the union "sending "unsolicited emails to ATO employees who are not union members or who have not notified the union they want to receive material from them"." If it was the KKK sending notes to non-members (say one of the minority groups they tend to target) you'd no doubt agree that was a bad idea.

As Res said - it contravenes the SPAM Act and the unions is lucky that they aren't being pursued for the $1.1M per day that the Act allows as penalty.
Ezy2Confuze
Oct 28, 2010 4:29 PM
I guess without knowing what was in the email, we will never know who is in the right, however the law does state that no-one can force you to join a Union, if this guy was trying o do that in any way, then the Union should pull it's head in and STFU.

Remember they wanted Fair work changed so they could go in and look at employeers books to see what Union and non Union members were being paid, how would you like it if you worked hard and your employer gave you a little extra, then gave it to the slackest person in the company because the Unions said it wasn't fair you were getting extra?
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 499

Vote