Twitter.com plagued with malware

 

Update: Microblogging site fixes flaw.

Twitter users were urged to switch to third party clients overnight after malware rendered Twitter.com useless and began posting links to malicious sites from within user accounts.

The microblogging site said this morning that it had fixed the vulnerability.

Hackers had used the Javascript command "onMouseOver" to insert malicious code into messages being displayed on Twitter.com.

Thousands of users re-circulated the exploit or were redirected to pages containing further malicious code merely by moving their mouse over a link on the page.

"The Twitter website is being widely exploited by users who have stumbled across a flaw which allows messages to pop-up and third-party websites to open in your browser just by moving your mouse over a link," said Graham Cluley, an engineer at IT security firm Sophos had posted.

"Messages are also spreading virally exploiting the vulnerability without the consent of users."

Cluley said there was a strong potential for "cybercriminals to redirect users to third-party websites containing malicious code, or for spam advertising pop-ups to be displayed."

Users were urged to use third party clients rather than Twitter.com until Twitter blocked the onMouseOver Javascript command.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Twitter.com plagued with malware
"Actually I appreciate deteego's explanation. Jp"
By johnpro2
 
 
 
Comments: 6
johnpro2
Sep 22, 2010 12:56 PM
Possibly one reason why Steve Jobs won't touch Java..?

Jp

Sams
Sep 22, 2010 2:58 PM
"Possibly one reason why Steve Jobs won't touch Java..?"

Javascript and Java are two completely different things.
deteego
Sep 22, 2010 3:03 PM
johnpro2 wrote:
Possibly one reason why Steve Jobs won't touch Java..?

Jp



Javascript is a client side functional dynamic scripting language usually used in browsers, Java is like a safe version of C++ run in a VM for generic programming

The two are very different things

Edited by deteego: 22/9/2010 03:06:14 PM
Ace
Sep 22, 2010 3:38 PM
Seems a rather basic flaw doesn't it?

ps: @deteego, pointing out technical differences to someone who is believes Java and Javascript are the same thing is probably a slight waste of bandwidth don't you think? I think Sams covered it off quite succinctly.
deteego
Sep 22, 2010 4:39 PM
Ace wrote:
Seems a rather basic flaw doesn't it?

ps: @deteego, pointing out technical differences to someone who is believes Java and Javascript are the same thing is probably a slight waste of bandwidth don't you think? I think Sams covered it off quite succinctly.


Try, I also think that whoever came up with the name javascript should be shot out of a cannon into the pacific
johnpro2
Sep 22, 2010 11:42 PM
Actually I appreciate deteego's explanation.

Jp
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 507

Vote