Facebook slammed for ‘deceptive’ approach

 

Privacy experts address social concerns.

View larger image View larger image View larger image

See all pictures here »

Queensland Privacy Commissioner Linda Matthews has criticised Facebook for deceiving potential users about its purpose.

Speaking on a panel at the World Computer Congress in Brisbane, Matthews highlighted the "enormous power" wielded by the social network with more than 500 million users.

Facebook promoted itself as a community; a place to share and connect with other human beings. But like most companies, its goal was to make money, she said.

"There's nothing wrong with making money; what's wrong is that it deceives potential users about that," Matthews said.

"There's a big difference [to users] between choosing to share your personal information to make friends, and sharing your personal information to make someone lots of money."

Corporate advisory lawyer Anna Sharpe, who was also on the panel, described her work on brand networks, which companies used to build rapport with their customers.

Rather than the vague, oft-used statement, "we will use your information for marketing", Sharpe said companies should disclose the information stored, its use and the parties that may access it.

"Given the complexity, I think the onus is on organisations to be a lot clearer on their privacy wordings," she said.

Although companies like Facebook, Google and Sun Microsystems have previously claimed that privacy was a thing of the past, panellists said the case for privacy still could be won.

"The auction is in full swing," said Goethe University professor Kai Rannenberg, addressing the session's theme: "Privacy ... going, going, gone?"

Rannenberg highlighted "privacy gateway infrastructure components" used by mobile telcos T-mobile Germany and Deutche Telekom that allowed users to determine how their information was used and with whom it was shared.

Personal information, he said, was an asset, and privacy required: the minimisation and decentralisation of data; empowering users; user-controlled identity management; privacy by design; and privacy standards.

Fellow panellist and Australian Privacy Foundation chair Roger Clarke observed that privacy would become more of a concern for those born after 1995, the i-Generation.

He observed that as Generation Y - those born between 1980 and 1995 - faced the impact of having their information stored and published online, 'iGen' would become more careful.

"Youth have always been risk-talkers," Clarke said. "The big thing that's changed is not the behaviour; it's the impact of the behaviour, how long that data exists and how many people have access to it."

"iGens are already absorbing those messages ... What will actually happen is that the young generation of right now will be more privacy conscious and more privacy demanding than their predecessors were."

Former Australian Privacy Commissioner Malcolm Crompton noted, "privacy is a cloudy term", highlighting linked elements of control, trust, risk and accountability.

He said users could exercise "people power" by deciding whether or not to use Facebook, and any other consumer services that came with privacy risks.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


"Facebook has made it very clear to its users - that they will use convoluted privacy policies, complex privacy controls, "opt-outs" of "share with everyone" defaults, etc to extract as much ..."
By Johnny Random
 
 
 
Comments: 2
peterhau
Sep 22, 2010 10:51 AM
speaking as one who has broken free of facebook - I had to, the numbers of people trying to contact me to connect, for no apparent reason, the numbers of strange groups I was invited to join, the surveys, the games and the subsequent tokens I could buy with my credit card made me realise that it was consuming me.

I delight in telling people that I don't use facebook. I use linkedin & twitter - this gives me enough extra contact to not have to worry about a lack of facebook. there are plenty of sites out there to discuss technology, I can do surveys if I want, and games? well, I just don't have the time to waste.

There are forums out there that allow me to discuss local topics, specific to my area like The RiotACT. There are sites like AUTechHeads that enable me to discuss technology and new directions in the industry. For my news, there is CRN, ITNews and I can be anonymous.

The facebook phenomenon, for me, is well and truly over. Now, I am waking up with a hangover and realising that every single thing I said or the pictures I posted have been seen by so many people, many of which I have never met, and they know who we are, where I live and that there is a lot to be gained from that information.

Luckily, I have deleted my profile, removed my photos, connections and the people who want to connect to me can via other means as they already know me.
Johnny Random
Sep 22, 2010 6:15 PM
Facebook has made it very clear to its users - that they will use convoluted privacy policies, complex privacy controls, "opt-outs" of "share with everyone" defaults, etc to extract as much information as they possibly can about us, so that they can in turn sell it and make money.

I'm not against Facebook making money - they do provide a pretty good service for free. What I against is deceptive business practices and an arrogant CEO who insists it is in our best interest to yield to these.

There are other social networking services emerging, such as MyCube, Diaspora and more, that are offering viable alternatives to Facebook and I encourage all to check them out.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
Photos: Google I/O 2013
Evolution not revolution.
 
Photos: NextDC builds S1 data centre
Prepares for September launch.
 
QLD Govt contributed to payroll project 'death spiral'
Inquiry hears from independent expert.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Do you prefer the Coalition's NBN policy?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 1599

Vote