US hospital appeals $270k breach fine

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Too slow.

California's Lucile Packard Children's Hospital has appealed a US$250,000 (AU$270,000) fine for tardily reporting a data breach to the relevant authority.

The breach occurred after a laptop was believed to have been stolen from the hospital, which threatened to expose 532 patients' details, it reported in a statement late last week.

Due to its reporting delay, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) had slapped the hospital with a hefty fine.

The hospital defended its belated alert to the department on the grounds that it was investigating with police what had happened to the computer.

After determining that it could not retrieve the device, the hospital then informed the department, it said.

The hospital said that a now-former employee had removed the computer from the hospital premises, adding that it had filed theft charges against the person.

Packard Children's chief information officer Ed Kopetsky said the hospital used "very sophisticated tools" to investigate missing computers.

"We are able to detect if the missing computer connects to a network that has access to the internet and we've been monitoring this activity regularly to determine if this computer has been online anywhere. It has not," he said.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


US hospital appeals $270k breach fine
 
 
 
Top Stories
Myer CIO named retailer's new chief executive
Richard Umbers to lead data-driven retail strategy.
 
Empty terminals and mountains of data
Qantas CIO Luc Hennekens says no-one is safe from digital disruption.
 
BoQ takes $10m hit on Salesforce CRM
Regulatory hurdles end cloud pilot.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  35%
 
Your insurance company
  5%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  9%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  4%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  18%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  15%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  7%
TOTAL VOTES: 3997

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?

   |   View results
I support shutting down the OAIC.
  27%
 
I DON'T support shutting the OAIC.
  73%
TOTAL VOTES: 1368

Vote