Coalition announces $100.5m cyber-safety plan

 

Cyber-safety policy announced.

The Liberal-National Coalition has unveiled a four-year, $100.5 million cyber-safety plan that would require ISPs to promote free, PC-based internet filters.

In policy documents released this week, it pledged $60 million to PC-based filtering: $10 million this financial year; $20 million in 2011-12; and $15 million per year afterwards.

The Coalition criticised the Labor Government's mandatory ISP-level filtering proposal, which was a controversial part of its four-year, $125.8 million cybersafety plan launched in 2008.

According to Coalition policy documents, Labor's ISP-level filtering proposal was "unworkable" due to speed, circumvention, and implementation issues.

"The only concrete decision [Communications Minister] Conroy has taken was the cancellation of the Howard Government's practical program to protect Australian families online," the Coalition stated, referring to the scrapped $84.8 million NetAlert program.

"The Coalition did not implement a mandatory ISP-level filter in government because it could not be shown to be workable or effective, offered a false sense of security to parents and would impact on internet speeds.

"For these reasons other democratic nations have also not implemented a mandatory filter," the Coalition stated.

While it acknowledged that "no filter can be perfect", the Coalition argued that PC-based filters were "much more dynamic" than ISP-level filters, and could monitor a wider range of online behaviour.

It planned to fund the entire cost of providing filters through grants to ISPs, and would collaborate with the industry on leveraging ISP-customer relationships to promote the filters.

Another $30 million would be spent on expanding ACMA's Cyber-safety Outreach program, which focused on educating teachers, students and parents.

ACMA would also be tasked with informing the Government on appropriate PC-based filter technology using the funding.

A further $10.5 million would be spent on establishing a National Cyberbullying Taskforce and helping schools tackle bullying and social networks.

Funding would come from the $26 billion the Coalition expected to "save" by scrapping ALP Government programs.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Coalition announces $100.5m cyber-safety plan
"Pity Labor couldn't come up with this one. With the NBN they would have it all sewn up. Of course, the Greens and the Sex Party support the NBN and a User filter policy, but I can't for the life ..."
By Pilotyoda
 
 
 
Comments: 8
Ace
Aug 11, 2010 5:31 PM
Now that is the cyber-safety policy we want.
RDEFCON1
Aug 11, 2010 9:02 PM
:) Agree with you there, Ace.
Sams
Aug 11, 2010 9:47 PM
The Libs appear to have got a policy right for a change. I'll still be voting Greens though.
ITrant
Aug 12, 2010 9:05 AM
In a couple of years, when PC-based filters are found to be insufficient, they will RELUCTANTLY introduce mandatory censorship. I'm still voting Greens, also.
Tom Brown
Aug 12, 2010 9:50 AM
I thank the Coalition for spelling out their policy.

It does not surprise me nor does it affect a change in my opinions, the coalitions policies all seem to be reactive but the result may be very different. the Coalition are determined to give Labour no credit for anything so they find fault with all Labours policies.

I support the censorship of some sites on the internet and the policy does not address the issue of censorship in Australian law. It is a bit of cotton wool to hide the sore and I am sure that will be obvious to many.

Note: If I thought that worldwide we could pull down those sites and prosecute the perpetrators and kill the industry it generates I would support that and then we would not need a filter.
deteego
Aug 12, 2010 12:57 PM
@ITrant, most filters are insufficient to a certain degree. The difference is between a filter that is highly abusable (issues with free speech in regards to government controlling the filter) and one that slows down the internet

PC based filter will always be more sufficient then a ISP one, the downside is people have to op in for it. Liberals have themselves said that Filters in general are not completely effective, so their stance is more "we are not going to implement a filter that will gimp the internet/freedom of speech or waste tax payer money". The liberals would probably never implement a mandatory censorship for that reason

Also btw, a vote for the Greens will go to Labor (unless you select preferences to go somewhere else, like the Liberals ;p). If you actually don't want the Filter to go through, ironically the best chance is to vote Liberals (and not Greens)
Sams
Aug 12, 2010 2:52 PM
"Also btw, a vote for the Greens will go to Labor (unless you select preferences to go somewhere else, like the Liberals ;p)."

So .. vote Greens and direct your preferences. I'm pretty sure everyone here understands the preference system.
Pilotyoda
Aug 13, 2010 7:46 PM
Pity Labor couldn't come up with this one. With the NBN they would have it all sewn up. Of course, the Greens and the Sex Party support the NBN and a User filter policy, but I can't for the life of me work out why the Liberal filter would cost so much.
An Australian Open-Source solution, coupled with mainly ISP distribution on the net (subsidise the excess bandwidth would be the only distribution cost) would not cost $60M.
By the way, @Deteego, If enough vote Greens, then the candidate gets in & preferences don't matter. If enough vote "below the line" and use their own preferences, then the pref's are split among the other parties and the candidate may get in, anyway.

Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  89%
 
No
  11%
TOTAL VOTES: 89

Vote