Australia scores a C on Akamai broadband report card

 

Shows improvement but needs to apply itself to the NBN.

Akamai's latest State of the Internet was a shot in the arm for supporters of the National Broadband Network, reporting that Australia was in the bottom half of nations in the Asia-Pacific for broadband speeds and slower than neighbour New Zealand.

The content-distribution service Akamai rated Australia, with an average connection speed of 2.6Mbps at 50th fastest broadband nation in the world; New Zealand with an average speed of 2.9Mbps was 42nd.

Russia was only slightly slower than Australia, recording an average speed of 2.1Mbps.

But Akamai, the company known for data centres that shunted internet traffic for such high-profile events as the World Cup and Mars Pathfinder missions, awarded Australia most-improved in the region with average broadband speeds lifting 19 percent in the quarter while most countries' performances were static or diminished.

South Korea was again the fastest on the planet with an average and maximum speeds of 12Mbps and 32.7Mbps, respectively.

It was followed by Hong Kong with an average speed of 9Mbps and Japan (7.8Mbps). The US was 16th globally with average speeds of 4.7Mbps.

State-by-state

Queensland earned the mantle of "Smart State", placing first for average Australian internet speeds at 2.7Mbps, shooting up the charts from its No.3 rank at the end of last year with 2.1Mbps.

The Northern Territory was the slowest region (1.1Mbps) not far ahead of Tasmania (1.5Mbps). Casuarina in the Top End was chosen among the next slew of sites to get early access to the National Broadband Network.

Australia's most populace states, NSW and Victoria, were broadband laggards, reporting speeds of just 2.2Mbps (No.6) and 2.5Mbps (No.4), respectively - well below the national average.

Perth, the world's most isolated capital of mining-boom state WA, lifted its rank from seventh to fifth with an average speed of 2.4Mbps up from 1.6Mbps in the earlier quarter.

Those with the need for speed should head to the nation's capital for their thrills because Canberrans were enjoying average speeds of nearly 2.7Mbps.

Attack traffic

The report cast some doubt on the oft-cited link between average internet speeds and centres for malicious attacks such as viruses and malware.

In order of originators of attack traffic, Russia (12 percent), the US (10 percent) and China (9.1 percent) were regarded as the three most malicious countries but only America ranked in the top third of countries surveyed; China was 124th for speed.

But Akamai found a loose connection between the number of internet protocol addresses, number identifiers unique to each computer, and the prevalence of attack traffic. The US was the No.1 country for IP addresses (129.3 million) while China was second (57.7 million) and Russia 12th  (8.8 million).

Although Australia was right behind Russia on IP addresses (8.4 million) it was just 45th for attack traffic, Akamai found.


Australia scores a C on Akamai broadband report card
"The "Tyranny of Distance" does play a role in many national infrastructure implementations, and always works to inhibit the scope of roll-outs. The high costs of rolling out 3000km of pipe, ..."
By Maxxi2
 
 
 
Comments: 14
Ace
Jul 28, 2010 1:20 PM
'Most improved' and '50th in the world'? Where were we last year? With the NBN in place, I'm expecting that Australia will be in a position to challenge NZ for 42nd place!
apaulefont
Jul 28, 2010 2:25 PM
Queensland placed first with 2.2Mbs and Victoria was fourth with 2.5Mbs? Someone wanna explain how that works?
nate.cochrane
Jul 28, 2010 2:50 PM
D'Oh! Mea culpa. Thanks for correcting me. Fixed now with the correct 2.7Mbps figure.
davo1
Jul 28, 2010 11:16 PM
south australia just doesn't get a mention??
Ace
Jul 29, 2010 1:26 AM
Where?
apaulefont
Jul 29, 2010 9:21 AM
you also have two states in 4th place - victoria (2.5) and perth (2.4)
apaulefont
Jul 29, 2010 9:23 AM
*WA
apaulefont
Jul 29, 2010 9:26 AM
guessing SA = 3rd (~2.6)
MerariSchroeder
Jul 29, 2010 9:59 AM
@Ace "to challenge NZ for 42nd place!"

Here's a thought...

We may never beat NZ. They are building a FTTH network. Except they have much less land to cover and a co-operative major ISP. They will likely have cheaper internet access in the long run and therefore users can buy faster speeds.

Even today, this is likely the case.
mad1k5
Jul 29, 2010 10:08 AM
@MerariSchroeder

The problem isn't LAND size, it's co--operative approach that we the problem.

For the first 3 years of office, plus the time that Liberals were in power, they had no chance with Telstra making a deal for a NBN-like related rollout, regardless if it's FTTN or FTTP.

The only way to solve this situation was with MONEY, the Coalition hate that idea, and will ALWAYS go for the cheapest SOLUTION.
anonymous
Jul 29, 2010 12:41 PM

@mad1k5, maybe it all depends on what you call a solution, sorry, SOLUTION.

Not sure otherwise what your point might be, but the ACCC court win against Telstra again highlights how bad it would have been if Telstra had been allowed to lock in a monopoly FTTN network, which they could have then used to remove the copper exchange-to-node links and so effectively strand all competing services.
Pilotyoda
Aug 1, 2010 2:18 PM
I live about 3.5Km from the end of a train line with an Exchange with an ADSL 2+DSLAM over the road from the station.
The best speeds I get are about 2.4Mb at odd times with low concurrent sessions in the area. My average is about 1.0Mb (too slow for the ABC I-View service) and at other times even 'Tube clips stall waiting for the stream to catch up. It gets worse when the rest of the family gets on-line as well.

Pilotyoda
Aug 1, 2010 2:20 PM
Part 2...
Radio transmission in the area is hit and miss because of the terrain and most wireless broadband services are slower than copper broadband (only 3 companies service this area).
The local primary school (<1Km away) has a fibre, but there are no nodes at all in the area. So the teachers get high speed for their email and the rest of us languish.
Bring on the Fibre_NBN!
Maxxi2
Aug 5, 2010 2:54 PM
The "Tyranny of Distance" does play a role in many national infrastructure implementations, and always works to inhibit the scope of roll-outs.

The high costs of rolling out 3000km of pipe, cable, fibre or roads between two centres is significant compared to rolling out 500km of the same. The same goes for rolling out 500km of the same compared to 150km...

Then we naturally had the Telstra restrictive monopoly issue for about a decade, which in the meantime has been significantly resolved since late 2007. As long as Conroy can continue this restructuring of the industry and execution of the NBN plans, we can look forward to improving our position dramatically...
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
NBN Co braces for secrecy probe
Opinion: Is commercial sensitivity a catch-all?
 
Exclusive: NBN Co withholds fibre upgrade price
Fears trial details could breach contractor confidentiality.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Was your 2012 IT budget...




   |   View results
Cut by less than ten percent?
  17%
 
Cut by more than ten percent?
  34%
 
Flat
  26%
 
Increased by less than ten percent?
  7%
 
Increased by more than ten percent?
  15%
TOTAL VOTES: 350

Vote
Will you still use DropBox and other cloud storage in the wake of the Megauploads saga?

   |   View results
Yes
  63%
 
No
  37%
TOTAL VOTES: 230

Vote