Losing bidders for Palm revealed

 

Apple, RIM and Google all wanted a piece of the action, claims report.

A report on BusinessInsider claims that a large number of companies had registered an interest in purchasing Palm earlier this year.

Around 16 firms were in discussions, with five leading to more "serious" talks, the report suggests.

These five were Apple, Google, Research in Motion (RIM), another unspecified bidder, and the eventual victor HP. BusinessInsider cited an unnamed source for its claims, but has provided a number of details.

Apple was after Palm's intellectual property and patent assets, which apparently number almost 900.

Apple may also have been interested in propping the firm up, particularly to "challenge RIM's dominance in the keyboarded segment of the smartphone industry".

Apple did not bid high enough, however, and neither did RIM, which was a high bidder and would have "had to work incredibly hard to blow it", according to the source. However, the firm apparently fell out of the running after HP upped its bid.

Google, the last also-ran, could live to regret its role in the deal, the report said, because it may have wanted to stop Apple buying Palm.

"Google supposedly didn't know Apple was actually bidding for Palm, so it didn't proceed," the insider said.

HP eventually acquired Palm for US$1.2bn ($1.4bn).

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Losing bidders for Palm revealed
 
 
 
Top Stories
ANZ looks to life beyond the transaction
If digital disruptors think an online payments startup could rock the big four, they’ve missed the point of why people use banks, says Patrick Maes.
 
What InfoSec can learn from the insurance industry
[Blog post] Another way data breach laws could help manage risk.
 
A ten-point plan for disrupting security
[Blog post] How can you defend the perimeter when it’s in the cloud?
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
What is delaying adoption of public cloud in your organisation?







   |   View results
Lock-in concerns
  29%
 
Application integration concerns
  3%
 
Security and compliance concerns
  27%
 
Unreliable network infrastructure
  9%
 
Data sovereignty concerns
  21%
 
Lack of stakeholder support
  3%
 
Protecting on-premise IT jobs
  4%
 
Difficulty transitioning CapEx budget into OpEx
  3%
TOTAL VOTES: 1043

Vote