Losing bidders for Palm revealed

 

Apple, RIM and Google all wanted a piece of the action, claims report.

A report on BusinessInsider claims that a large number of companies had registered an interest in purchasing Palm earlier this year.

Around 16 firms were in discussions, with five leading to more "serious" talks, the report suggests.

These five were Apple, Google, Research in Motion (RIM), another unspecified bidder, and the eventual victor HP. BusinessInsider cited an unnamed source for its claims, but has provided a number of details.

Apple was after Palm's intellectual property and patent assets, which apparently number almost 900.

Apple may also have been interested in propping the firm up, particularly to "challenge RIM's dominance in the keyboarded segment of the smartphone industry".

Apple did not bid high enough, however, and neither did RIM, which was a high bidder and would have "had to work incredibly hard to blow it", according to the source. However, the firm apparently fell out of the running after HP upped its bid.

Google, the last also-ran, could live to regret its role in the deal, the report said, because it may have wanted to stop Apple buying Palm.

"Google supposedly didn't know Apple was actually bidding for Palm, so it didn't proceed," the insider said.

HP eventually acquired Palm for US$1.2bn ($1.4bn).

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Losing bidders for Palm revealed
 
 
 
Top Stories
Matching databases to Linux distros
Reviewed: OS-repository DBMSs, MariaDB vs MySQL.
 
Coalition's NBN cost-benefit study finds in favour of MTM
FTTP costs too much, would take too long.
 
Who'd have picked a BlackBerry for the Internet of Things?
[Blog] BlackBerry has a more secure future in the physical world.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  70%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 718

Vote