Google: Human raters don’t impact site rankings

 

Raters review Google’s algorithmic changes.

Google Australia has defended the role of human raters in its page ranks, claiming that the actions of one rater could not directly affect the placement of any individual site.

In an interview with business news site FT.com this week, Google engineer Amit Singhal said the company used "human raters to assess the quality of individual sites" to counter the abuse of page ranks.

The ranking model was questioned in the New York Times and ZDNet, where blogger Tom Foremski suggested that raters could "have the power to promote or even completely erase a site from the Google index".

But a Google Australia spokesman told iTnews this was not the case.

The so-called 'Quality Raters' are not engineers - rather, Google hires users like University students to provide feedback on their search experience, thereby rating Google's search algorithm.

Feedback is then aggregated and provided to Google's engineers, who tweak the algorithm accordingly.

"Google uses human raters as a quality check to help ensure algorithmic ranking changes we make are positive gain for users worldwide," the spokesman told iTnews.

"These raters do not impact the rankings of any individual site.

"We do however, enforce our quality standard for individual sites and we're and transparent about those guidelines listed on Google webmaster tools site."

The spokesman would not disclose details of the recruitment and employment of the raters, declining to specify if any were located in Australia.

Google is currently the most used search engine in the world, accounting for 82.9 percent of Australian internet searches in March, according to information services company Experian Hitwise.


Google: Human raters don’t impact site rankings
"A better idea would be to use Law Students directly and let them assess claims on websites. Or Tax Course students."
By himagain
 
 
 
Comments: 3
himagain
Jul 17, 2010 10:21 AM
Quality raters - "like Uni students"???
No wonder the system is so hard to get sense from.
Rather like using Doctors to rate medical performance..... oh, that's what they do....
himagain
Jul 17, 2010 10:21 AM
Quality raters - "like Uni students"???
No wonder the system is so hard to get sense from.
Rather like using Doctors to rate medical performance..... oh, that's what they do....
himagain
Jul 17, 2010 10:23 AM
A better idea would be to use Law Students directly and let them assess claims on websites.
Or Tax Course students.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 509

Vote