Third party apps sour Apple's security credentials

 

Doubling of average flaws thanks to third party apps.

More flaws were found in Apple's software than any other vendor over the first six months of 2010, according to vulnerability researchers at Secunia.

The report [PDF] found that Apple beat long term leader Oracle and steady third placed Microsoft for the top spot on the vulnerabilities list. However, the report found that while the top 10 companies were targeted, they accounted for barely a third of all vulnerabilities, with third party applications causing a doubling of vulnerabilities on the average user PC last year.

The increase in the amount of third party application has fueled a big rise in the number of vulnerabilities the average user has to deal with the report found.

“This analysis clearly identifies vulnerabilities from third party programs to be almost exclusively responsible for the increasing trend observed since 2007,” the report states.

“Data from the first half of 2010 shows that third party program vulnerabilities are the primary risk factor for typical end-user PCs.

The average number of vulnerabilities has risen from 220 in 2007 to around 420 by 2009. In the first half of the year this had already risen to 380 and Secunia predicts it will rise to around 760 for the year.

Overall the company's research from 2005 finds that the general level of vulnerabilities in any new code hasn't changed much, suggesting that companies have got as far as they can bug testing first generation software. The increase in 3rd party applications is demonstrated in the increased threat profile.

“At a large scale the security ecosystem appears to be in a state of equilibrium, at the current rate of common vulnerabilities and exposures supporting that generally software vendors are still unable to release vulnerability free software,” the report concludes.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Third party apps sour Apple's security credentials
"I'm afraid that ITrant is suffering from a condition known as iBlindness."
By Slatts
 
 
 
Comments: 3
ITrant
Jul 13, 2010 3:06 PM
I'll take Apple's security vulnerabilities over Microsoft's any day! You'd have to question the methodology of a report which ranks Apple with zero actual security problems as more vulnerable than Microsoft with millions of actual security problems. By market share, you'd expect Apple to have 'some' problems, at least thousands. When reality trumps theory, you need to take a good look at the theory.
Ace
Jul 13, 2010 4:27 PM
Are we reading the same thing @ITrant? Where does it say Apple has "zero security problems" and Microsoft has "millions of actual security problems"? The report indicated that Apple had more security vulnerabilities than anyone else (pg 5/6). This is not an 'actual number of vulnerabilities' figure -it also takes into account the usage of the software (market size etc), the type of vulnerability, and the severity of vulnerabilities.

A hard pill for an Apple user to swallow? It happens when you enjoy more popularity as a software company. Just ask Microsoft.

As for preferring to be hacked into by a Mac hacker over a Windows hacker...well, that's just a little weird.
Slatts
Jul 13, 2010 9:33 PM
I'm afraid that ITrant is suffering from a condition known as iBlindness.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 508

Vote