DEEWR sacks 51 IT contractors, apologises

 

Contractors dismissed without notice.

The Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) has apologised for the sudden dismissal of 51 of its 300 Canberra-based IT contractors.

According to a report in the Canberra Times yesterday, staff were "walking around dazed" after being told on Wednesday that they should not return to work the next day.

The Department backpedalled on the move shortly after, with its secretary Lisa Paul issuing a public apology to the contractors in the newspaper today.

A DEEWR spokesman told iTnews: "The Department is in the process of contacting all of the IT contractors concerned."

"[The Department] will continue to work with them to discuss their individual circumstances and where appropriate, offer re-employment."

According to the Community and Public Sector Union's (CPSU) communications director Dermot Browne, the contractors received phone calls from senior managers, who apologised and offered them an additional month of work.

"It was a mistake," Browne told iTnews today. "There was a glitch in the process; these people were not given sufficient notice.

"As soon as it happened, some of our members got in touch, and we jumped on the phone to management, who was equally surprised."

Unlike employees, independent contractors are not protected by Fair Work Australia's National Employment Standards that require four weeks' notice of termination.

Browne said the minimum amount of notice for contractors varied from contract to contract. However, it was standard practice in the public sector to give contractors at least 28 days' notice.

"Giving any worker - contractor or otherwise - 24 hours' or less notice is unacceptable," he told iTnews.

DEEWR's dismissal of IT contractors is understood to be part of the Government's response to the 2008 Gershon Review, which recommended that IT work be moved in-house.

Last August, Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner told iTnews that the recommendation had already saved the Government $7 million and would likely result in the creation of 200 full-time IT positions.

Although CPSU's Browne noted that dismissed contractors would not be directly offered full-time positions due to the Government's merit-based selection obligations, he expected there to be work available for these people.

Brown said more contract positions would likely be cut from public sector IT in the near future.

"We strongly support the general direction of the Gershon Review," he said. "We believe that it would be more efficient to bring these IT skills in-house."


DEEWR sacks 51 IT contractors, apologises
"umbria wrote: Sounds like WorkChoices, Gillard-style, with no rights even for long-term contractors. agreed however will just be pushed under the carpet"
By Couriers
 
 
 
Comments: 7
DJ
Jul 2, 2010 3:43 PM
Good One DEEWR, the primary reason why contractors are assisting with these activities is because you are unable to recruit permanent "in-house" staff.

It's great to bring these function in-house, but if you can't find the right staff you either need to engage contract staff or stop providing the relevant services/functions.

Short-sighted management bureaucrats sitting in ivory towers with no clue how to provide enterprise services.

Go ahead, replace experienced contractors who are paid on results, with in-house public servants who work 9-5 with 2 hours for lunch and don't give a crap about systems being down when it's home time.

Wake up.
block
Jul 2, 2010 3:57 PM
A major issue is the governments inability to pay high level staff industry rates. Over a certain pay grade and you aren't allowed on the tools.

Only way around that is to outsource.
deonast
Jul 3, 2010 1:33 AM
DJ didn't work where I did. I was a public servant, I often worked while eating lunch. It was some of the managers who took 2 hour lunch breaks and smoko breaks and any other break you can think of.

We once had a contractor as an operations manager who didn't give a shit when systems were down and left us to tackle the fallout.

So not every stereo type is valid. No I'm not currently a public servant, I had had enough with management and resigned.
umbria
Jul 3, 2010 2:44 PM
Sounds like WorkChoices, Gillard-style, with no rights even for long-term contractors.
entnow
Jul 4, 2010 12:33 AM
remember when they outsourced all this,it ended up costing more,this doesn't surprise me get a lawyer and a payout.
FTHARGG
Jul 4, 2010 3:21 PM
Seriously??

I am a Contractor for a Commonwealth Agency and my contract has an end date. That is my notice. If I don't find a new role or get my renewal underway 4-6 Weeks out then I go hungry.

Yes there is a problem with renumeration of public servants unable to be paid what the market dictates but there is an equal issue with contractors acknowledging they are just contractors for the money and as such do not look for new contracts. Sounds like this happened at DEEWR.

So given there is no project to be engaged on, the 1 Month renewal is really a notice period for political reasons. I assume I will see some contractors on the market or maybe they will take a Permananent Role because they seem to be sudo permies anyway.
Couriers
Jul 11, 2010 3:55 AM
umbria wrote:
Sounds like WorkChoices, Gillard-style, with no rights even for long-term contractors.
agreed however will just be pushed under the carpet
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  90%
 
No
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 62

Vote