Attorney General: So long, AusCERT

 

McClelland snubs AusCERT during cyber security week.

View larger image
Attorney-General Robert McClelland discusses CERT's role. CERT Australia (computer emergency ...
View larger image
Attorney-General Robert McClelland and Ms Deborah Anton – head of CERT Australia - unveil a ...
View larger image
Cake. A multi-layered approach?

See all pictures here »

Australia's Attorney General Robert McClelland has dropped AusCERT from a proposed partnership that would have seen the University of Queensland operation retain a role under the nation's new 'official' computer emergency response team, CERT Australia. 

"CERT Australia will be fully established within the Attorney-General's Department (AGD) rather than through the partly contracted model that was previously envisaged," McClelland told delegates from the banking, telecommunications, energy and water sectors at yesterday's first National Cyber Security Information Exchange in Sydney.

McClelland [pictured] ended speculation since the establishment of CERT Australia last year over AusCERT's involvement in the Government's "official" CERT plans.

"We are disappointed the Attorney-General's Department has chosen not to partner with AusCERT in support of the national CERT role," Jeremy Crowley, Director of AusCERT and Information Technology Services at the University of Queensland, said in a statement yesterday.

Via so-called Joint Operating Arrangements, CERT Australia's participants are now exclusively government agencies, which include the Australian Federal Police, the Australian Communications and Media Authority, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, Defence Signals Directorate (DSD), and the Department of Broadband and Communications amongst others.  

The DSD launched its new Cyber Security Operations Centre earlier this year - also part of CERT Australia - and plans to hire around 150 staff over the next five years. 

McClelland called CERT Australia the "fulcrum" of business and government security information exchange since it was now the single point of contact. 

But AusCERT warned the new framework could waste taxpayer dollars.

"We hope that CERT Australia won't use taxpayer funds to duplicate the services of a not-for-profit organisation that has a proven track record for delivering these services effectively for many years",  said Crowley.

McClelland also announced that CERT Australia would be sending thirty representatives from the private sector in Australia and New Zealand to the US for training with its Department of Homeland Security. 

CORRECTION - The original text of this story suggested that AusCERT was funded by the Federal Government. AusCERT is funded by subscribers and various contracts held with various government agencies, but is not funded directly by the Government. Federal Government agencies remain as subscribers to AusCERT. iTnews apologises for the error.


"Does this mean the Federal Government will report its own data breaches on a future data breach disclosure requirement within the Privacy Act? Food for thought. Edited by brettwinterford: ..."
By BrettWinterford
 
 
 
Comments: 5
imortl
Jun 11, 2010 8:47 AM
This is just a ploy by AGD to keep an empire in house, nothing more. AUSCert has established itself with a process and framework to deal with the domestic requirements for a CERT. AGD will just work to replicate this infrastructure and prcess, suffer all the teething issues that setting any service like this up and then run in parallel (or worse withdraw AUSCert funding forcing its closure) and wasting almost as much money as the Internet filter project will in the process! DO not be deceived, I believe it will be millions a year to re-invent the wheel, just so that the AGD can empire build!

Great way to waste taxpayers money! Thank you so much for doing this instead of funding staff for hospitals!

M@

Res
Jun 11, 2010 9:43 AM
"CERT Australia's participants are now exclusively government agencies"

God help us..

more NANNY STATE control, J.H.C! when will these moronic losers pXXX off and leave things alone that work so well. Why does the Aust communist party (aka: alp) need to royally XXXX up this country as much as they can before being removed from office later this year.

Gerry Hervey got it so right, they are a "bunch of the bloody amateurs" .. (my insert: who need to control everything and anything. just like China does and Adolf Hitler did, see where we're heading folks?)
btone
Jun 11, 2010 10:05 AM
"McClelland also announced that CERT Australia would be sending thirty representatives from the private sector in Australia and New Zealand to the US for training with its Department of Homeland Security".

They should then return fully briefed on the Patriot Act and ready to assist AFACT and ACMA in the latest ways to dismember local terrorists downloading US TV shows.

What can you expect, the AG has the same factional/faux religious breeding as Conroy.

patfree
Jun 15, 2010 10:26 PM
Yet again Liam Tung gets it wrong - the Joint Operating Arrangements are only between ASIO DSD and AFP. ACMA and DBCDE have no role. A little research would of shown - but to help check this out http://www.aph.gov.au/House/committee/coms/cybercrime/subs/sub25.pdf
BrettWinterford
Jun 16, 2010 6:09 AM
Does this mean the Federal Government will report its own data breaches on a future data breach disclosure requirement within the Privacy Act? Food for thought.

Edited by brettwinterford: 16/6/2010 06:10:21 AM
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Revealed: 2012 e-government award winners
Government highlights projects, professionals of the year.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 480

Vote