Google Australia prepares for two-front investigation

 

Did Google breach Privacy, Telecommunications Acts?

Google Australia has promised to cooperate with both the Privacy Commissioner and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) should it face a two-front investigation of its discontinued WiFi data harvest.

The AFP is currently determining if it will pursue an investigation of Google that was referred to the agency by Attorney-General Robert McClelland this week.

Australian Privacy Commissioner Karen Curtis has meanwhile been in discussions with Google since mid-May, and yesterday confirmed that her investigation would continue even if the AFP investigation were to proceed.

"My Office continues to conduct an investigation into Google's collection of WiFi payload data," she told iTnews.

"Our understanding is that the Australian Federal Police (AFP) is looking at Google's compliance with the Telecommunications Interception Act ... my investigation is ongoing and the focus is compliance with the Privacy Act.

"The Privacy Commissioner will continue to liaise with the AFP as our investigations continue."

Should Google be found guilty of breaching the Privacy Act, it may be fined and ordered to destroy its records of the data.

Penalties for contravening the Telecommunications Interception Act range from financial compensation to two years' imprisonment.

An AFP spokesman told iTnews that it was assessing the matter against its operational priorities to determine if it will accept the Google investigation.

"The AFP can confirm that it has received a referral from the Attorney-General's Department," he said.

"The referral relates to possible breaches to the Telecommunications Interception Act ... This matter is being assessed against the Case Categorisation and Prioritisation Model (CCPM)."

Globally, Google has admitted to collecting some 600 gigabytes of data transmitted over public WiFi networks, including publicly available network information, as well as the more sensitive 'payload data' that was transmitted over the networks.

The search giant claims that it had been collecting payload data by mistake; however, it has been accused of attempting to patent its WiFi sniffing technology in November 2008.

A Google Australia spokesman told iTnews that the November 2008 patent was "entirely unrelated to the software code used to collect WiFi information with Street View cars."

"This [collecting payload data] is a mistake for which we are profoundly sorry," the spokesman said yesterday. "We are talking to the appropriate authorities to answer any questions they have."


Google Australia prepares for two-front investigation
"Google is paying the price for taking on the communications minister over his filter. No matter how wild-west U.S. politics seem, that's nothing compared to Australian politics. Australian ..."
By ITrant
 
 
 
Comments: 5
nakerjack
Jun 8, 2010 4:06 PM
COME ON!!!! just how much info do you think they collected if the cars were constantly moving?
I think this is a total load of BS - and trust the media/Conroy to keep harping on about it. Doesnt Conroy have advisors who would have advised this sounds like a bunch of crap!?
JohnLongmuir
Jun 8, 2010 5:40 PM
If you have broadcast un-encrypted data on a free band then you have made that data as public as if you had printed it on a billboard outside your house. I would be more worried about the neighbourhood hacker than Google.
realitybites
Jun 8, 2010 5:55 PM
JohnLongmiur is spot on with that comment, nuff said. I have some questions tho, Connroy made the statement that Google had specifically written some code to do the sniffing, first question: Has this or can this be confirmed? and second question is does this "code" get around the security of wireless devices?
Google seem very keen to admit guilt, but I see no need for that if these wireless devices are properly secured. There seems to be a stink in the room, but not enough evidence to suggest who is responsible.
JoeSoap
Jun 8, 2010 5:59 PM
then he couldn't deflect his filter (also invading the privacy of every australian) and cause google to be the bad guy. Think about it with everyone focused on google and realitybites comment on the openess of wifi network even the qld police would be in breach then (ref: http://www.itnews.com.au/News/150387,queensland-police-plans-wardriving-mission.aspx ) so shouldn't they be investigated for doing that as well ?
ITrant
Jun 8, 2010 8:01 PM
Google is paying the price for taking on the communications minister over his filter. No matter how wild-west U.S. politics seem, that's nothing compared to Australian politics. Australian politicians are the most protected politicians in the world. There is no guaranteed freedom of speech in Australia. Australian politicians are protected by "their" legal system. In Queensland Premiers jail politicians who threaten to expose their misdeeds. I'm sure there are just as many stories in other states and federally. Google, you have my support to withdraw from Australia any time you like. We need a wakeup call.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Revealed: 2012 e-government award winners
Government highlights projects, professionals of the year.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 480

Vote