Zombie PCs to be throttled, isolated under new ISP code

 

Voluntary ISP code of practice launched for Cyber Security Awareness week.

Internet service providers should quarantine or even slow down the connections of customers with infected computers, according to a new Australian industry code of practice.

The voluntary code of practice was designed by the Federal Government and the Internet Industry Association (IIA) to formalise cyber security standards for ISPs and customers.

The code [PDF] outlines measures to educate customers, detect malicious activity on the network, take action against compromisde customers and also a requirement to report serious activity to the Australian Federal Police and the national computer emergency response team (CERT).

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy announced the code at yesterday's launch of Australian Cyber Security Awareness Week, and hinted that the code might not remain 'voluntary' should ISPs not sign up.

"At the moment we're working with [IIA CEO Peter Coroneos] and the industry, to make it work this way," Mr Conroy said. "Down the track if it doesn't work - [compulsory adherence to the code] is something we'll have to look at.

"But we are genuienly working well with the sector to get the best outcome."

The code is built around a free monitoring service introduced by the Australian communications and media authority (ACMA) in 2005 -- Australian Internet Security Initiative -- which is used by 78 ISPs to detect whether their customers' computers are connected to a network of hacked PCs, known as a botnet.

The government and IIA have added several resources for ISPs including standard cyber security education messages, notification guidelines, a requirement to report significant infections to the authorities and courses of action to reduce a threat.

The recommended courses of action include the option to slow down or limit a customer's connection.

"Actions that ISPs can take when they become aware of a compromised computer include... apply an ‘abuse' plan where the customer's internet service is speed throttled," the code recommends.

"Temporarily quarantining the customer's service, for example by holding them within a ‘walled garden' with links to relevant resources that will assist them until they are able to restore the security of their machine."

These two measures are more relaxed than suggestions made in a draft of the code in September last year, which recommended ISPs cut access to zombie-infected PCs altogether.

The code states that "user privacy is paramount", but does not provide details for how this will be protected if a compromised computer is reported to authorities.

The ISP code is policed by the IIA and there are no penalties for breaches, according to IIA CEO Peter Coroneos.

"It goes around the compliance symbol," Mr Coroneos said. "They'll be given a trust mark that they put on their website that shows that their code is compliant.

"If we become aware down the track in the unlikely event that an ISP is going to stop acting in their best interests, then we'll take action." 


Zombie PCs to be throttled, isolated under new ISP code
"wait a minute... Did I just feed a Troll ?"
By realitybites
 
 
 
Comments: 8
HyRax
Jun 7, 2010 7:56 AM
This is all well and good, but what about bots that communicate via an encrypted tunnel?
Tenoq
Jun 7, 2010 8:53 AM
@ HyRax

Some ISPs already cause trouble for those using encrypted tunnels internationally. ;)

But it is a very good question. What parameters of usage define a computer as being part of a botnet? I like the idea - I'm just not convinced on its technical feasibility.
himagain
Jun 7, 2010 1:40 PM
I'm a definite non-nerd, but the idea of making the ISP responsible for secure activities is no different to ensuring hamburger joints maintain a modicum of health safety for clients.
I WOULD like to know how the botnet tracking could work - but I think this would mean banning the use of certain products used by 90% of the ordinary users as well as corporations. :-)

Security concious organisations like SOME Banks and say, PayPal(r) actually monitor traffic for unusual activity and I don't see that as a privacy concern.

However a simple solution for the BIG problem of spam would be to limit email traffic to a very basic figure say 1000 per day outwards and subject to proof of requirement and legitimacy to exceed that. THAT would be a great first step!

Daveh
Jun 7, 2010 4:04 PM
All well and good. Particularly the part about education and informing people. However, that in and of itself is the major flaw.

I know people who are unable to understand some of these concepts and enact them in the real world following three years of undergraduate education. Would the government be footing the bill for every callout based on these issues?

It is great for the government and industry to finally acknowledge that the real issue on the internet is lack of user knowledge. After all, look at what the gaffe prone Conroy spouts - after being informed by his research team.

Realistically though this will simply cause more problems, with education falling to the way-side as Mums and Dads who have curious children are removed from the internet following a simple mistake or two. They will be cut off, directed to a website that will provide them incomprehensible instructions and in the end will be turned off the internet.

himagain has provided a fantastic example of this with his assumption that 'products' are what create botnets rather than a deliberately written virus with a flimsy disguise.
Rodney
Jun 10, 2010 12:08 AM
This is rubbish! It's like back in the '60s when we used to go shopping with string bags and we got every thing wrapped in paper and the supermarkets decided to give us plastic bags. Come forward 40 years and it's all our fault for the plastic bag epidemic, and then when we want one we have to pay for it. We pay ISPs for our internet services. It is from ISPs that our computers get infected. Now, that's not rocket science. No internet=no viruses or malware, but it's all our fault! ISPs supply us with the internet and it's inherent garbage. We actually pay for the garbage they funnel to us. I say we force ISPs to block the garbage at its source, at the ISPs nodes. The internet was originally free back in the day, I remember it well. Well, it still is. The ISPs get it for free and then sell it to us. Just like the supermarkets did with the old plastic bags. I could be my own ISP if I wanted to, any one can. It's not hard to do, google it. I say get the ISPs to stop the crap coming to us. Like the previous poster said, "I know people who are unable to understand some of these concepts and enact them in the real world following three years of undergraduate education." You can buy a bumper sticker in newsagents that says,"I can't get your point of view because I can't get my head up my **** that far."
Rodney
Jun 10, 2010 12:08 AM
This is rubbish! It's like back in the '60s when we used to go shopping with string bags and we got every thing wrapped in paper and the supermarkets decided to give us plastic bags. Come forward 40 years and it's all our fault for the plastic bag epidemic, and then when we want one we have to pay for it. We pay ISPs for our internet services. It is from ISPs that our computers get infected. Now, that's not rocket science. No internet=no viruses or malware, but it's all our fault! ISPs supply us with the internet and it's inherent garbage. We actually pay for the garbage they funnel to us. I say we force ISPs to block the garbage at its source, at the ISPs nodes. The internet was originally free back in the day, I remember it well. Well, it still is. The ISPs get it for free and then sell it to us. Just like the supermarkets did with the old plastic bags. I could be my own ISP if I wanted to, any one can. It's not hard to do, google it. I say get the ISPs to stop the crap coming to us. Like the previous poster said, "I know people who are unable to understand some of these concepts and enact them in the real world following three years of undergraduate education." You can buy a bumper sticker in newsagents that says,"I can't get your point of view because I can't get my head up my **** that far."
realitybites
Jun 10, 2010 1:19 AM
@Rodney : "A closed mouth gathers no feet"
Think about it...
realitybites
Jun 10, 2010 1:29 AM
wait a minute... Did I just feed a Troll ?
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  90%
 
No
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 63

Vote