Jetstar: How to run IT with five staff

 

Who needs in-house skills when you’ve got the cloud?

Jetstar CIO Stephen Tame sees his suppliers as he sees his investment stocks - a balanced spread of risk, with some paying bigger dividends than others.

Tame revealed today that the budget airline operates with just five full-time IT staff, focused almost exclusively on managing a number of outsourcing partners including IBM (check-in/kiosk), Sonnet (desktops), Zensar (Operations app development and BPO), Telstra (telecommunications), iGate (Engineering app development) and CapGemini (Data Warehouse).

Other boutique suppliers include 4loop (ESB and Middleware), PM Partners (Project Management), Vedaleon (Airport, Airline, app development) and Sissit (SMS research and development).   

In August, Tame will deliver a keynote address at the IT Financial Management conference, in which he will discuss his unique approach to managing these suppliers.

"I manage outsourcing agreements and suppliers much like I would a personal investment portfolio," he shared with iTnews this week.

"When you take a personal investment portfolio, you are concerned about the management of risk, weighed up against the best return.

"You invest money into some solid businesses with low risk, and then you also invest some into some smaller suppliers that represent greater risk, but potentially greater rewards."

Tame said Jetstar's IT team has sourced a "portfolio of services" from across its supplier base in much the same way.

The only complexity with this worldview, he said, is when one service provider relies on the services of another to deliver a certain outcome. An applications provider, for example, would require an infrastructure supplier to provide systems availability to deliver the right outcomes.

But that's an issue Tame tackles with simple delegation of responsibility.

"The structure can be self-correcting, or self-sustaining," he said.

Some of Jetstar's higher-level suppliers - those responsible for delivering business outcomes - are also tasked with looking after the suppliers they rely on - the systems or server providers, for example.

"One or two of your suppliers can help manage the rest," he said.

Again, Tame has an analogy to help break down the model.

"If I had a 100 percent in-sourced IT department, and my engineering systems manager came to me and said he couldn't deliver a report because the systems managed by the operations group or infrastructure group were down, I would not accept that as a valid excuse.

"That engineering systems manager should have managed [those lower down the chain] better.

"The fact that our IT is outsourced shouldn't change how it works."

Tame said the days of developing and maintaining your own IT applications are well and truly over, requiring less in-house resources.

"These days, services are so often packaged or available in the cloud," he said. "It isn't about how you develop or deliver services, but how you manage them.

"My five staff simply ensure services are delivered."

Don't miss Stephen Tame's keynote presentation at the IT Financial Management Conference in Sydney on August 10.


Jetstar: How to run IT with five staff
Source: Terence Ong
 
 
 
Top Stories
ANZ looks to life beyond the transaction
If digital disruptors think an online payments startup could rock the big four, they’ve missed the point of why people use banks, says Patrick Maes.
 
What InfoSec can learn from the insurance industry
[Blog post] Another way data breach laws could help manage risk.
 
A ten-point plan for disrupting security
[Blog post] How can you defend the perimeter when it’s in the cloud?
 
 
Source: Terence Ong
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
What is delaying adoption of public cloud in your organisation?







   |   View results
Lock-in concerns
  29%
 
Application integration concerns
  3%
 
Security and compliance concerns
  27%
 
Unreliable network infrastructure
  9%
 
Data sovereignty concerns
  21%
 
Lack of stakeholder support
  3%
 
Protecting on-premise IT jobs
  4%
 
Difficulty transitioning CapEx budget into OpEx
  3%
TOTAL VOTES: 1039

Vote