Internode finds bug in Ericsson DSLAMs

 

Other ISPs upgrade to avoid problems.

ISP Internode has discovered a software flaw that has crippled some of the Ericsson-branded Ethernet controller nodes (ECNs) on its network - a flaw that may lie dormant within the networks of other service providers.

Internode's managing director Simon Hackett posted a lengthy technical explanation of the issue late last week, which had caused broadband service issues in some exchanges in South Australia.

Hackett said the fault had been "traced to a software bug in one of the multiple software systems running in the ECNs."

He said the faulty software release had operated "flawlessly for around five months until this fault developed" and said there had been "zero indication of the potential for this to happen".

"The current theory, based on vendor [Ericsson's] feedback, is that the software fault is a latent, load triggered, memory leak that makes the ECN lose the plot in a manner that corrupts some critical item inside one of the ECN systems - an item that remains corrupted after it is rebooted or power cycled," Hackett said.

"Our vendor has subsequently identified a bug that is consistent with our observed outcome, and on their advice, we upgraded to the next revision of the code concerned (in which that specific bug had been fixed)."

The newer software release had resolved issues for customers on affected ECNs. However, Hackett said customers on yet-to-be-upgraded switches were also becoming affected.

"Based on vendor advice, we are now looking at how best to upgrade the rest of the network, to guard against a further recurrence elsewhere," he said.

iiNet saved by earlier upgrade

It was understood that at least one other major Australian ISP - Perth's iiNet - had the same model Ericsson ECNs in its ADSL2+ DSLAM configuration.

iiNet chief technology officer Greg Bader told iTnews they had already upgraded affected boxes.

"We upgraded ours earlier in the year - [we] saw some issues similar to Internode but not really much customer impact," Bader said.

"We had a failure rate of around 0.05 percent with the ECNs, [which meant] minimal customer impact."

It was unclear whether customers that used the affected software were notified to upgrade their systems. An Ericsson Australia spokesman has been contacted for comment.

Ericsson counts ISPs including iiNet, Internode, TransACT, Primus, TSN, Netspace and Adam Internet among its DSLAM customers.

Some are understood to run networks based on a different model of Ericsson DSLAM, which did not run the same software.

It was not the first time that a software bug had impacted Ericsson DSLAMs.

In 2007, iiNet ADSL2+ users experienced connection problems using the point-to-point protocol over Ethernet (PPPoE) method that was caused by faulty software.


Internode finds bug in Ericsson DSLAMs
"ruru - I just post the truth and facts - you are the one who is just a blinded Fanboi obviously. If you are "inflammed" by the truth , then you are beyond help. Your posts are more troll like by ..."
By Digger11
 
 
 
Comments: 8
Bazwalt
Apr 7, 2010 10:26 AM
Little concerning that upgrades aren't always done on core equipment. In my opinion they should be treated the same as your own system and always upgraded as soon as a new release comes.
Digger11
Apr 7, 2010 12:39 PM
Just another reason why I will always stay with a proper ISP who has the resorces and ability not to run into these problems.
You select a discount ISP like iiNet or Internode and then you have to expect to get these problems.

Big business will not touch these little ISP's (guess why ???) , so neither will I.
My time is too valuable.
schneider82
Apr 7, 2010 2:06 PM
Digger,

What "real" ISP are you talking about. Internode is the fourth biggest ISP so little is quite a stretch! They support huge companies and I have NEVER had an issue with them. I have four connections with them. I have had a connection from them since 2001! If you are talking about Telstra or Optus you have NO idea how wrong you are! any problems with a connection with either of those and you will be waiting for a LONG time. Internode's CEO was apologetic for wait times of almost 30 mins a few months ago as there wait times were and are back to around 1 minutes. Ring Telstra see how long it takes to hear a 'real' person
anonymous
Apr 7, 2010 3:16 PM

Being cheeky, I interpret schneider82's comments this way:

"Digger... you have NO idea..."

Anyone see it differently?
Jimmah
Apr 7, 2010 3:18 PM
Baz - upgrades aren't done on core equipment for the precise reason that doing so can introduce problems to a stable system. If everything is running smoothly, there are no security vulns and no new features that are required - why rock the boat?

Digger - as usual a pathetic attempt at a troll. As has been indicated, Internode is a large national ISP, has contracts with many large organisations and tops the Whirlpool Broadband Choice survey practically every year.

Where does your ISP come in?

Disclaimer - I am not an employee of Internode. I have been a customer for nearly 10 years and have nothing but good things to say about the quality of the service.
Digger11
Apr 14, 2010 8:45 AM
@anonyomus, Yeah, Internode Staff and Fanboi's often cannot see the woods for the trees.
His argument is like sayign that becasue they sell more Hyundai Excel's than S-Class Mercedes (my car of choice) that the Hyundai msut be better.

My comment that big business will not touch the 2nd class ISP's like iiNet and Internode is still 100% factual.
You pay for a Hyundai and you ususlly get one.

On ringing real people, I would prefer to ring Telstra and wait to talk to an Aussie than ring IInet and talk to a South African. I strongly believe in supporting Australian workers.

@Jimmah -why are you even posting again ? If you don't like to read the truth then stop reading my posts - I usually don't read yours. Calling someone a Troll because you do not like their opinion just shows at what level you operate.
ruro
May 6, 2010 3:26 PM
Real ISP like Telstra? This is the same Telstra that is currently experiencing a large NextG outage in QLD and has had two major network faults following poorly planned network upgrades in their IP network this year?

Digger, you almost always post deliberately inflammatory comments which is one definition of trolling.
Digger11
May 7, 2010 10:31 AM
ruru - I just post the truth and facts - you are the one who is just a blinded Fanboi obviously. If you are "inflammed" by the truth , then you are beyond help.

Your posts are more troll like by "attacking the man" and not dealing with the facts.

Why do you think big business that wants reliable Telco. services will not touch the small companies like Internode or iiNET ??? Do you think they have not heard of them or something ????

BTW: I would estimate that Telstra's network is about 100 times more complex than the small DSLAM sites run by Internode. Of course Telstra will occasionally have hiccups - but at least they have the resources to fix them up quickly.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Revealed: 2012 e-government award winners
Government highlights projects, professionals of the year.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 480

Vote