Google explains Apps data centre failure

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Honest assessment of February outage.

Google has published a post-mortem of an incident in February in which Google Apps went down for over two hours.

All Google App Engine applications were "degraded" from 7:48am to 10:09am PST on 24 February after a power failure at the company's main data centre, the firm said.

About 25 percent of the servers failed within five minutes owing to a delay in back-up power generation. Google's message boards started showing questions from users almost immediately.

"By this time, our primary on-call engineer had determined that App Engine is down," the report said.

"The on-call engineer, according to procedure, paged our product managers and engineering leads to handle communicating the outage to users. A few minutes later, the first post from the App Engine team about this outage is made on the external group."

There was confusion about the instructions for switching to a back-up data centre and the decision-maker for the crossover could not be found. The team then received data suggesting that the data centre was recovering and that a changeover was not neccesary.

However, the data turned out to be inaccurate and this extended the outage considerably. By the time the move to the backup servers had been made, Google Apps had been down for more than two hours.

The report found that Google had not developed plans for a partial data centre failure, nor for determining whether the data centre was able to continue running on such a reduced server count.

The company will now hold regular drills for failure, with a wider spectrum of possible situations, and a bi-monthly audit of all operations documents.

Google claimed that a similar failure today would cause a service slowdown for a maximum of 20 minutes with the new procedures, rather than a complete outage.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Google explains Apps data centre failure
 
 
 
Top Stories
CIO exits as Coles steps up offshoring
Updated: Engages Accenture in Manila; staff to learn of their fate today.
 
Matching databases to Linux distros
Reviewed: OS-repository DBMSs, MariaDB vs MySQL.
 
Coalition's NBN cost-benefit study finds in favour of MTM
FTTP costs too much, would take too long.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  71%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 796

Vote