White House cyber-security chief praises Oz security

 

Howard Schmidt says international co-operation is vital.

Howard Schmidt, the White House's cyber-security adviser, has labelled Australia's cyber-security strategy as "wonderful" during his talk at the RSA Conference in San Francisco this week.

Delivering a keynote address at the conference Schmidt, who was appointed the cyber-security coordinator for the Obama administration last December, praised Australia's cyber security developments - among only three other countries.

"Australia has put together a wonderful cyber security strategy; the UK is, [also], and Germany is putting together all kinds of great things," said Schmidt.

Discussing the US Government's international cyber-security strategy, Schmidt said partnerships on an international government level are fundamental for a safe internet.

"At the government-to-government level it's making sure that other governments that we have relations with, that we're doing security with, that we're doing military operations with, have the mechanisms that focus on cyber-security in their governments as we do in our government.

"And you see some really good examples of that," he said.

"We can't continue to go the way we've been going and expect things to be good. Governments need to be engaged," he said.

Rocky relationships with [other] governments should not impact the international fight against cyber crime, he added. "We have legitimate disagreements time-to-time between governments, but that should not impact foreign policy or the need to look into the cyber-security issue...particularly cyber-security issues.

"Nobody wins if there's disagreements on the internet. We're the benefiter of it, we use it all the time, so as a consequence we've got to work internationally, make sure we've some norms, rules of engagement from a law enforcement perspective and also from a diplomatic perspective.

"I think once we start focusing on some of the issues we'll move a lot further on solving the issues," he said.

 


White House cyber-security chief praises Oz security
"Instead of all this back-slapping... how about we agree on a way to stop spam. Catching them and prosecuting is hard. The easiest way is to up-the-ante, making an adjustment for the low rate of ..."
By Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu)
 
 
 
Comments: 1
Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu)
Mar 6, 2010 10:53 PM
Instead of all this back-slapping... how about we agree on a way to stop spam. Catching them and prosecuting is hard. The easiest way is to up-the-ante, making an adjustment for the low rate of capture, by agreeing to give details to Israel's secret service MOSAD, to take them out (assassinate the ring-leaders). Follow up who you send money to, and who they on-send it to, and then pass details and $50k to MOSAD, paid for by the productivity savings of a billion people seeing a million less spam emails per 'removal'.

OK, so if we can't make it a capital crime, seems we need to do one of two things:
A) Identify all servers (wherever internationally) and give them 14-days notice to fix issue, or be disconnected from internet. If their users have BOTS, then the server must identify and advise, and cut those users off etc. This can be considered a "branch and leaf lopping" approach. A related development would be to require all countries to use the 100-point system to track "the person" operating a web-site, in the same way that you need to identify yourself in Australia to open a bank account or purchase a mobile phone... to prevent it being used anonymously for causing terror to others, or performing financial scams on others.

B) Have email users purchase blocks of encrypted licence numbers, with the 1cent/email proceeds going to 'United Way' (super-charity collection system) in USA, and equivalent common-charity collection methods in other countries, or via the UN for international aid. Then every time an email is sent, it has a unique valid licence number attached, and the servers check for this, else fail to on-route. The one cent will not stop any valid non-spammer, but will stop people sending ten million emails, in the hope that some tiny percentage of recipients are duped into visiting a fake web-site, or buying into a scam. We can call this the "charity cause" approach. In the roll-out period, those countries not participating would have their emails flagged as "likely spam" by most servers, so countries would have real incentive to get on board.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  90%
 
No
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 63

Vote