White House cyber-security chief praises Oz security

Mar 5, 2010 3:53 PM
Tags: howard | schmidt | rsa10

Howard Schmidt says international co-operation is vital.

Howard Schmidt, the White House's cyber-security adviser, has labelled Australia's cyber-security strategy as "wonderful" during his talk at the RSA Conference in San Francisco this week.

Delivering a keynote address at the conference Schmidt, who was appointed the cyber-security coordinator for the Obama administration last December, praised Australia's cyber security developments - among only three other countries.

"Australia has put together a wonderful cyber security strategy; the UK is, [also], and Germany is putting together all kinds of great things," said Schmidt.

Discussing the US Government's international cyber-security strategy, Schmidt said partnerships on an international government level are fundamental for a safe internet.

"At the government-to-government level it's making sure that other governments that we have relations with, that we're doing security with, that we're doing military operations with, have the mechanisms that focus on cyber-security in their governments as we do in our government.

"And you see some really good examples of that," he said.

"We can't continue to go the way we've been going and expect things to be good. Governments need to be engaged," he said.

Rocky relationships with [other] governments should not impact the international fight against cyber crime, he added. "We have legitimate disagreements time-to-time between governments, but that should not impact foreign policy or the need to look into the cyber-security issue...particularly cyber-security issues.

"Nobody wins if there's disagreements on the internet. We're the benefiter of it, we use it all the time, so as a consequence we've got to work internationally, make sure we've some norms, rules of engagement from a law enforcement perspective and also from a diplomatic perspective.

"I think once we start focusing on some of the issues we'll move a lot further on solving the issues," he said.

 


  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
White House cyber-security chief praises Oz security
"Instead of all this back-slapping... how about we agree on a way to stop spam. Catching them and prosecuting is hard. The easiest way is to up-the-ante, making an adjustment for the low rate of ..."
 
 
Comments: 1
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu)
Mar 6, 2010 10:53 PM
Instead of all this back-slapping... how about we agree on a way to stop spam. Catching them and prosecuting is hard. The easiest way is to up-the-ante, making an adjustment for the low rate of capture, by agreeing to give details to Israel's secret service MOSAD, to take them out (assassinate the ring-leaders). Follow up who you send money to, and who they on-send it to, and then pass details and $50k to MOSAD, paid for by the productivity savings of a billion people seeing a million less spam emails per 'removal'.

OK, so if we can't make it a capital crime, seems we need to do one of two things:
A) Identify all servers (wherever internationally) and give them 14-days notice to fix issue, or be disconnected from internet. If their users have BOTS, then the server must identify and advise, and cut those users off etc. This can be considered a "branch and leaf lopping" approach. A related development would be to require all countries to use the 100-point system to track "the person" operating a web-site, in the same way that you need to identify yourself in Australia to open a bank account or purchase a mobile phone... to prevent it being used anonymously for causing terror to others, or performing financial scams on others.

B) Have email users purchase blocks of encrypted licence numbers, with the 1cent/email proceeds going to 'United Way' (super-charity collection system) in USA, and equivalent common-charity collection methods in other countries, or via the UN for international aid. Then every time an email is sent, it has a unique valid licence number attached, and the servers check for this, else fail to on-route. The one cent will not stop any valid non-spammer, but will stop people sending ten million emails, in the hope that some tiny percentage of recipients are duped into visiting a fake web-site, or buying into a scam. We can call this the "charity cause" approach. In the roll-out period, those countries not participating would have their emails flagged as "likely spam" by most servers, so countries would have real incentive to get on board.
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment
 
 
 
Top Stories
Oracle shuts down open source test servers
Playing nice with the open source community, Larry?
 
Google hosts election debate
Lundy, Fletcher and Ludlam face off on tech policies.
 
Telstra fined $18.5m for exchange access
Kept competitive DSLAM kit out.
 

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
"Now Julia, if only you would promise not to filter the internet in your next term of government ..."
by hsvandrew Jul 31, 2010 9:33 AM
 
"@Nate - my fears are that if we use a national consortium as an interface to international ..."
by heavenlyhaloes Jul 31, 2010 12:41 AM
 
"Did anybody notice that on Apple's website the iPhone is missing the AT&T logo on the top bar? ..."
by brownenicola Jul 30, 2010 10:18 PM
 
"@digger11 - when will you learn just to remain quiet when you don't have all the facts or a ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 7:13 PM
 
"Wakie is right, Digger11 is either an exceptional forum troll or a massive moron. For those who ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 6:51 PM
Polls
Did Google breach the Telecommunications Interception or Privacy Acts during its WiFi wardrive?

   |   View results
Yes. There is no excuse for collecting this data.
  28%
 
No. If your wireless network is unsecured, you have no right to complain
  72%
TOTAL VOTES: 1873

Vote