Banks accept Dubai assassins' stolen IDs

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Special report: Passport credentials still valid for identity fraud.

The stolen identities allegedly used in the assassination of Hamas official Mahmoud al-Mabhouh are still valid documents for the purposes of conducting business online in Australia, an iTnews special investigation revealed.

Our investigation has revealed that the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (DFAT) has either failed to cancel the stolen passport credentials of the three Australian citizens used in the attack, or has failed to update the My Passport database used by some Australian financial institutions to verify the identity of new customers.

The investigation also showed that Australia's mass media had amplified the impact on those affected by the identifty theft by publishing their credentials in full online. Of those media outlets publishing images of the victims' passports, only the ABC and the Seven television network obscured sensitive information such as passport number and dates of birth. 

The test

Today, we used the details of two victims to open transaction accounts online with Australian financial institutions.

The financial institutions offering these banking and trading accounts used an online verification system from identification company Edentiti. This company used information from public databases, including the telephone directory and Passport Office to confirm the identity of individuals, without the need for them to physically present proof of identity documents.

Edentiti's service is used by financial institutions and betting agencies. It checks the validity of the date of birth and other details on the passport, by accessing the My Passport feature on the department's website.

But although the department's site has the extra step of asking for a mother's maiden name and guarantor's name (presumably, the person who signed the passport photo and application), some implementations of Edentiti used by financial institutions simply check that the passport is valid and details are correct based on date of birth, full name and place of birth.

The application processes required the input of addresses, information easily obtained through simple online searches.

Edentiti founder and chief technical officer Kevin Cox admitted in some cases a passport number, name (at birth) and address would be enough information to pass the verification test, but argued in most cases more information is required.

"The thing about authentication is one source and one source only is not good enough," he said.

Cox said if the passports were cancelled [by DFAT]  then they could not have been used to open the accounts.

He said the scenario presented by iTnews highlighted where governments needed to protect the citizens' identities.

"What we want to see in the long run is that whenever your identity is used somewhere, you are informed about it. If these people suddenly got a note saying 'Welcome to the United Arab Emirates' they would have known."

With the increase in online identification, Cox said it was inevitable that identity theft would become easier to perpetrate than identity fraud, which required the creation of a new identity.

"In this way, they've had to steal someone's identity rather than create a fictitious identity," he said.

ITNews is waiting for comment from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Elton Cane contributed to this story.


Banks accept Dubai assassins' stolen IDs
 
 
 
Top Stories
ANZ looks to life beyond the transaction
If digital disruptors think an online payments startup could rock the big four, they’ve missed the point of why people use banks, says Patrick Maes.
 
What InfoSec can learn from the insurance industry
[Blog post] Another way data breach laws could help manage risk.
 
A ten-point plan for disrupting security
[Blog post] How can you defend the perimeter when it’s in the cloud?
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
What is delaying adoption of public cloud in your organisation?







   |   View results
Lock-in concerns
  29%
 
Application integration concerns
  3%
 
Security and compliance concerns
  27%
 
Unreliable network infrastructure
  9%
 
Data sovereignty concerns
  21%
 
Lack of stakeholder support
  3%
 
Protecting on-premise IT jobs
  4%
 
Difficulty transitioning CapEx budget into OpEx
  3%
TOTAL VOTES: 1043

Vote