Commentary: Think B4 U waste our time and money

Feb 9, 2010 2:43 PM
Tags: conroy | filter | safety | children | protect | afp | acma | telstra | government | microsoft

Be afraid - it's Safer Internet Day 2010.

The Australian Federal Police (AFP), ACMA and Telstra are today urging people to think before publishing personal information that could be valuable to cyber criminals.

The move comes as part of International Safer Internet Day, which was created by the UK Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre. Down under, the campaign is sponsored by Microsoft Australia.

In a media release publicising International Safer Internet Day 2010, the AFP offers gems of wisdom such as "It does not take great IT skills to use search engines" and reveals that "online sex offenders are out there looking at your photos and personal information".

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) site proved just as informative: It provided some tips, one of which suggested that instead of using your actual name you should go by a username or "appropriate handle". Good advice until you read the next tip, which recommends never sharing that username with anyone.

Is it just me that finds it unclear why Safer Internet Day 2010 is represented on video by a computer mouse that gets naked and then uses a mobile phone to take a picture of itself before publishing it online?

There are times when companies and organisations invest resources into a project that helps the community. Then there are times when a bunch of organisations have excess marketing dollars and want to be seen to be doing something.

Guess which scenario we have here?

This campaign could also be used by the Government as further evidence that the general public -- and please think of the children -- can't be trusted to look after themselves online.

Shortly after announcements from the AFP, ACMA and Telstra, Conroy's office published a media release highlighting his new report, Online Risk and Safety in the Digital Economy, which details some of the latest developments in internet filtering technologies.

"It highlights that we all have a role to play in managing online risk, including governments and regulators, operators of online services and users themselves," Conroy said in a statement.

How will "International Safer Internet Day" help Australian internet users? What do you think are the motivations behind this initiative? Will a mandatory internet filter mean we will be able to leave children to use the internet unsupervised? Use talkback below or start a conversation with me on Twitter @mkotadia.


  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Commentary: Think B4 U waste our time and money
"Liberal started this net filtering program, labor is continuing it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hel... #Internet_Filtering"
By Yertle
 
 
Comments: 9
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
BrettWinterford
Feb 9, 2010 2:44 PM
Munir - I think this campaign can be summed up in four words. "Important idea. Bad execution."
arcanedevice
Feb 9, 2010 3:14 PM
@BrettWinterford, my thoughts exactly. But then it also sums up the way our governments are acting - just look at the filter and SA's failed attempts to 'out' anonymity...
Yertle
Feb 9, 2010 3:28 PM
If the whole point of the internet filter is so that children can use the internet unsupervised then people shouldn't be having children. It's up to parents to look after their kids, not the government. I don't need babysitting so why should the filter be enforced on me??
Daveh
Feb 9, 2010 4:02 PM
The scariest thing for me is exactly what can be drawn by what we are seeing in parallel. Mention of kids doing stupid things online and the internet filter.

The internet filter will not stop this kind of behavior. It will not stop these pictures spreading. It will likely not stop them being accidentally stumbled upon within Australia.

We should NOT be paralleling Safe Internet Behavior with the proposed internet filter. Already i have spoken with people and rebutted claims as to the filters ability to block viruses(because those viruses serve illegal content and the government will stop it).

As Brett pointed out, this is a good idea but a VERY bad execution. Safer internet is about people becoming more self reliant and gaining skills. Filtering to save people doing it themselves is the opposite.
Ace
Feb 10, 2010 9:56 AM
The Howard government used to provide free net-nanny software that parents could download & install to protect their kids from the evils of the internets. This struck me as a good idea, and I don't know why the Ruddsters ditched it.
BrettWinterford
Feb 10, 2010 10:33 AM
@Ace - the interesting point is that the Ruddsters ditched net-nanny software because nobody was downloading it. But wouldn't that suggest a lack of demand for filtering in any form?
Ace
Feb 10, 2010 10:39 AM
I only became aware of it when news arose that they were ditching it. Maybe it just wasn't advertised well enough?
AnthonyCaruana
Feb 11, 2010 3:14 PM
@yertle - exactly. the reposnsibility to teach kids and monitor them is assigned to parents.

However, I've given seminars on "parenting in the digital age" and one excuse I keep running into is that many parents are far less computer litereate than their kids. I always offer them the same counsel - learn.

If something is really important then parents must take responsibility and learn.
Yertle
Feb 11, 2010 4:54 PM
Liberal started this net filtering program, labor is continuing it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Coonan#Internet_Filtering
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment
 
 
 
Top Stories
Oracle shuts down open source test servers
Playing nice with the open source community, Larry?
 
Google hosts election debate
Lundy, Fletcher and Ludlam face off on tech policies.
 
Telstra fined $18.5m for exchange access
Kept competitive DSLAM kit out.
 

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
"Now Julia, if only you would promise not to filter the internet in your next term of government ..."
by hsvandrew Jul 31, 2010 9:33 AM
 
"@Nate - my fears are that if we use a national consortium as an interface to international ..."
by heavenlyhaloes Jul 31, 2010 12:41 AM
 
"Did anybody notice that on Apple's website the iPhone is missing the AT&T logo on the top bar? ..."
by brownenicola Jul 30, 2010 10:18 PM
 
"@digger11 - when will you learn just to remain quiet when you don't have all the facts or a ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 7:13 PM
 
"Wakie is right, Digger11 is either an exceptional forum troll or a massive moron. For those who ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 6:51 PM
Polls
Did Google breach the Telecommunications Interception or Privacy Acts during its WiFi wardrive?

   |   View results
Yes. There is no excuse for collecting this data.
  28%
 
No. If your wireless network is unsecured, you have no right to complain
  72%
TOTAL VOTES: 1873

Vote