Google enables multitouch on Android

 

Will Apple respond with a lawsuit?

In a surprise move this morning, Google announced that it was officially enabling the latent ability of Android phones - including the new Google Nexus One - to use pinch-to-zoom functionality in the phone's Browser, Gallery and Maps applications.

Multitouch is a feature which enables users to interact with a touchscreen by using more than one finger. For example, the intuitive use of finger & thumb to "pinch & zoom" - one of the most popular features of Apple's iPhone operating system.

Until now owners of Android phones have had to rely on workaround hacks from independent Android developers to enable multitouch on their handsets. Understandably, people unwilling to modify their phone and lose the warranty have been annoyed that Google had disabled the feature.

iTnews had been investigating potential reasons for Google keeping this feature disabled during the last two weeks and as recently as January 24, all Google Australia PR was willing to confirm was that  the Android 2.0 framework "includes support for multi-touch" - but other questions were effectively stonewalled.

We asked Google why some Android phones have multitouch enabled/disabled depending on which market they're sold in. For example, the Motorola Droid in the USA has multitouch disabled while the identical phone sold in Europe as the Motorola Milestone has multitouch enabled.

The Google Australia spokesperson responded by explaining that Google had significant input into development of the Android framework but "as with other platform technologies, such as the text-to-speech engine, carriers and OEMs can choose to implement it" as they please. 

Tech blog Engadget recently interviewed Eric Tseng, Senior Product Manager for Android at Google, and grilled him about the absent multitouch feature on Android handsets and he also evaded the question by rephrasing it:

"When people say 'why doesn't Android have multitouch?' it's not a question of 'multitouch'... I want to reframe the question. We have multitouch - what people are asking for is specific implementations in the UI that use multitouch, like pinch-to-zoom, or chording on the keyboard," he was reported as saying.  

Apple owns the trademark for "Multi-TouchTM" when referring to a touchscreen interface.

Our take

It has long been speculated that the real reason for Google not officially enabling multitouch was a "gentlemen's" agreement with Apple to avoid infringing on patents such as #7479949 which includes claims such as: "instructions for detecting one or more finger contacts with the touch screen display; instructions for applying one or more heuristics to the one or more finger contacts to determine a command for the device; and instructions for processing the command."

Until recently, Apple has been quite rightly able to argue that the iPhone has several user friendly features such as multitouch ability and the best touchscreen smartphone screen which are superior to Android handsets. But these advantages are one-by-one being eroded with announcements like Google's bombshell today.

The ball is now in Apple's court. Only time will tell if the company is willing to unleash a phalanx of lawyers to defend its multitouch patents, or if it satisfied that the cold war standoff to date has provided the iPhone with enough competitive advantage to gain significant market share.


Google enables multitouch on Android
"It's unlikely that Apple could launch a lawsuit because the technology is based on that developed at the University of Toronto. One of those early developers, Bill Buxton, heads Microsoft's ..."
By nate.cochrane
 
 
 
Comments: 1
nate.cochrane
Feb 3, 2010 12:45 PM
It's unlikely that Apple could launch a lawsuit because the technology is based on that developed at the University of Toronto. One of those early developers, Bill Buxton, heads Microsoft's multitouch development. So if anyone were to launch a lawsuit, it would be Microsoft or UToronto.

That hasn't happened yet so Google is likely in the clear. If a lawsuit were to be launched, it would be to access patents -- that is common practice and no indication of malfeasance or even infringement. It's a routine bargaining chip; foreplay for IP lawyers.

There are any number of patents belonging to the likes of Microsoft, Wacom (which collaborated with UToronto) and most notably Jeff Han from Perceptive Pixel among others.

Just because Apple may have the greatest mindshare doesn't mean it's the originator of the technology nor is it even the leader. It certainly doesn't indicate any ability to successfully litigate for reasons other than those above.

For more, check out http://www.crn.com.au/Feature/165247,hypecycle-multi-touch-systems.aspx
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  93%
 
No
  7%
TOTAL VOTES: 30

Vote