Interpol chief slams body scanners

 

Passport fraud a bigger problem.

The head of international law enforcement organisation Interpol has launched a scathing attack on the use of body scanning technology in airports, according to an Associated Press report.

Speaking to AP at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Interpol Secretary-General Ronald K. Noble argued that better intelligence and information sharing between countries is required, rather than wide-scale body scanning technology.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown told parliament last week that body scanners would be placed in UK airports this week.

The US has already rolled out machines at its airports and a growing number of countries are following suit, after Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attempted to blow himself up on a flight to Detroit over the Christmas holiday period.

However, the Interpol chief’s views echo growing dissent over the use of what many believe to be flawed technology.

Noble is reported as questioning “the amount of money and resources that go into these [body-scanning] machines", and argued that passport fraud is a bigger travel threat.

“The greatest threat in the world is that last year there were 500 million, half a billion, international air arrivals worldwide where travel documents were not compared against Interpol databases," he told AP.

“You don't know the motivation behind the person carrying the passport. [If you're a terrorist] are you going to carry explosives that are going to be detected? No."

This week MEPs expressed concerns over the privacy and health implications of the technology, arguing that body scanners should not become “the religion of counter terrorism”.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Interpol chief slams body scanners
"It's just a matter of thinking about everyday substances, really. For instance, flour circulated through the air-conditioning could create a nasty explosion, and I don't think flour is prohibited,..."
By meski
 
 
 
Comments: 2
jdrive
Feb 1, 2010 8:50 AM
Interpol's Noble is absolutely right. We throw money at technology and award contracts to substantial government contractors on systems that will not do much more than spook the general public while providing an illusion of security. Meanwhile, we have little idea who is actually traveling. Detroit is simply the latest example of paying attention to the wrong thing... an inter-departmental database check would have prevented the incident. It also would have flagged many of the terrorists involved in 9/11 before they boarded their flights.

Last year the TSA in the US (which has not had a leader for 14 months and counting) let an entire industry die - the Trusted Traveler industry - rather than foster its growth. How big a deal was that? Well, a quarter-million people had provided more detailed information about themselves than is actually known about the airline employees moving bags under an airplane, so you tell me. Had the industry survived, that number would likely have been in the millions within just a few years.

Knowing who a traveler is - and what disparate databases show about their activities - is far more valuable than the cat-and-mouse game played at the screening stations, which is mostly theater and will be bypassed again. First it was box cutters, then exploding shoes, then came the 'liquids" scare, and most recently, exploding underwear. What's next, TSA-issued one-piece overalls and changing stations?

meski
Feb 1, 2010 11:40 AM
It's just a matter of thinking about everyday substances, really. For instance, flour circulated through the air-conditioning could create a nasty explosion, and I don't think flour is prohibited, yet... (google flour mill explosions) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washburn_A_Mill
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Vodafone Australia churn nears half a million for 2011
British joint owners 'not pleased'.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  84%
 
No
  16%
TOTAL VOTES: 243

Vote