Facebook privacy settings shift with 'social norms'

 

Claims that users want more openness.

Facebook co-founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has claimed that its lowering of users' privacy in December was in line with current "social norms".

The new privacy settings introduced at the end of last year faced a significant amount of opposition from digital rights groups and users.

Before the changes, users had the option to expose just a limited profile of themselves or remain hidden altogether.

But the modifications meant that more details contained in users' profiles were publically displayed by default, including their picture, current city, list of friends and fan pages.

"People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people, and that social norm is just something that has evolved over time," Zuckerberg said at a start-up event in San Francisco on Saturday called the Crunchies.

"We view it as our role in the system to be constantly innovating and updating our system to reflect the current social norms.

"A lot of companies will be trapped by the conventions and legacies of the systems they have built, and while doing a privacy change for 350 million users is not the kind of thing that a lot of companies would do, we view it as important to always keep a beginner's mind and think what would we do if we were starting the company now.

"We decided that these would be the social norms now and we just went for it. "

However, Zuckerberg's remarks conflict with the previously stated Facebook line.

Facebook said at the time of the privacy changes that they were intended to give users more control over their information, as the new settings allowed users to customise individual pieces of information, like videos or photos they upload, and to decide with whom to share them.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Facebook privacy settings shift with 'social norms'
"One thing I want back is the options for the news feed! I use to be able to disable the news/live feed from showing whenever I commented on someone's wall, linked them to a video or image.. but ..."
By disgruntled_goat
 
 
 
Comments: 2
imortl
Jan 12, 2010 8:53 AM
I was mortified when my privacy details were changed. I have set myself up to see photos of friends etc, not to be found by the ghosts of christmas past or random people that I don't know.

I saw the "update" about security but did not look into it too much under the misguided belief that they would not change anything without my express permission. You can imagine my surprise when a friends ex-wife suddenly sends me a message!

Yes, I should have read it more closely. However, I still was not happy about being set to the "Defaults" rather than being given the option to keep my existing settings.
disgruntled_goat
Jan 12, 2010 10:05 AM
One thing I want back is the options for the news feed! I use to be able to disable the news/live feed from showing whenever I commented on someone's wall, linked them to a video or image..

but now I only get the option to show to friends, no one or everyone?!? seriously how is that a new improved privacy feature? I don't see why people need to see when I post this on John Smith's wall "hey you going out tonight?"

thats one feature that needs to come back the option to disable that! I dont want to have to manually set it EACH TIME I COMMENT on someones wall :-(......

Though with these new changes it gives e-stalkers a chance to look at photos before people notice and change their settings!
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Tech staff spared in ANZ's 1000 job cuts
Cost cutting hits middle management.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  83%
 
No
  17%
TOTAL VOTES: 245

Vote