Mozy glitch fogs the reliability of storage clouds

Discovery by former S Central engineer raises new questions.

Imagine if your cloud storage provider experienced a technical error that caused your bandwidth bill to balloon into the thousands of dollars.

That's a scenario feared by Dan Frith, a storage and virtualisation engineer and former employee of S Central - and now an unhappy  customer of the EMC-owned Mozy online backup storage service.

For the past week, Frith has been struggling with a glitch in his Mozy account.

When his Mozy service is working correctly, the storage cloud connects to his machine once a day to check which files on his system were updated or modified and transfers only these incremental changes to the replica of his hard drive stored in Mozy's US data centre.

On November 14, Frith noted the system connect to his machine and request to start the usual daily transfer of changed files. Strangely, Mozy was requesting a data transfer of 32 Gigabytes of data - not just the incremental changes but the entire contents of Frith's hard drive.

"It sort of smells," Frith said. "I am confident I haven't lost the data - I can still restore from one week ago, from before there was a problem. But imagine if I lost [the locally-stored] data from just the last day or two - data that was essential - how would I get that back?"

Frith has since been in regular contact with Mozy's support staff for answers, posting the discussions on his blog, but the company is yet to provide a fix.

"We recently starting experiencing an usually high amount of volume of data centre traffic that prevented the Mozy client from adequately identifying files that were previously backed up," reads a note from Devin Knighton, a public relations professional at Mozy, in a response to Frith's blog. "As a result, Mozy is sending third or fourth copies of the same files to our data centres."

Broadband concerns

Frith said that he is fortunate to have negotiated a contract with his ISP under which uploads are not calculated as part of his monthly bill.

"But I have friends that use the Mozy service that have 110GB up there, and some of them do pay for uploads," he said. "Do the maths on what he would pay if this happened to them."

Frith said that he is a home user of Mozy and "perhaps could be assured of better SLA's [service level agreements] if I went out on a limb and got Mozy Pro".

But his problem has gained the attention of cloud watchers around the globe as concerns rise around the reliability of the next generation of IT services. 

"I think this technology is still very immature," Frith said. "We get given this sense of protection from a service like this. You put your data up there, but the question is whether these operators value your data as much as you do. It's just blocks and files to them."


  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Mozy glitch fogs the reliability of storage clouds
"Can technology go wrong, absolutely, that doesn't mean it doesn't work 99+% of the time. Even ISPs have down time and they can also incorrectly calc brandwidth spent. Not an excuse for Mozy in ..."
 
 
Comments: 2
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
ChiliPepr
Nov 23, 2009 12:07 PM
Mozy works pretty well for me – on both Mac and PC. Their server product needs some work, however, the interface is extremely convoluted and not user friendly at all.

Edit: Affiliate link removed.

Edited by bengrubb: 23/11/2009 12:24:13 PM
akoulianos
Dec 14, 2009 4:07 PM
Can technology go wrong, absolutely, that doesn't mean it doesn't work 99+% of the time. Even ISPs have down time and they can also incorrectly calc brandwidth spent. Not an excuse for Mozy in anyway and their handling of the event (without seeing transcripts from both sides) doesn't sound great. There is a risk with using cloud storage that something might go wrong as in this case, but you are better off having online backup than not. You are also better off monitoring your backup regardless if it is a set and forget solution. At the end of the day it is your data. Systems and processes are there to ensure that it is protected and these need to be constantly reviewed and improved.

I think in this case it comes down to bad communication with the client and not prioritising the issue quickly enough so that it can be fixed and the customer looked after.
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment
 
 
 
Top Stories
Analysis: Net gambling next on ISP filter hitlist?
Stakeholders brand online gambling laws ineffective.
 
NBN3 Wireless plan needs 4G spectrum fast-track
Dark fibre and wireless coalition issues new proposal.
 
Server patch blamed for Westpac outage
Back-up processes keep business customers online.
 

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
"@rdefcon1, NBNCo has displayed fiscal prudence throughout, perhaps because it was isolated from ..."
by umbria Sep 6, 2010 10:38 AM
 
"speach no peach"
by Ice Sep 6, 2010 10:28 AM
 
""Build it once, build it right, build fibre" said Tony Windsor, yesterday. The coalition would ..."
by umbria Sep 6, 2010 10:18 AM
 
"Content and hosting providers are network ready, it really comes down to software issues (cPanel ..."
by hashkent Sep 6, 2010 9:48 AM
 
"Re Dave68IT: Not that simple. Yes he would have that debt anyway, but at least he would have ..."
by RaTTyRaTT Sep 6, 2010 8:49 AM
Polls
Was sacking four Victorian police officers for inappropriate email use too harsh?

   |   View results
Yes
  56%
 
No
  44%
TOTAL VOTES: 120

Vote