Day 17: Film industry attacks iiNet witness selection

 

Chief executive Michael Malone bears the brunt.

ISP iiNet's chief Michael Malone has witnessed first-hand an attempt by barristers representing the film industry to assassinate his character in the Federal Court, with the film industry's lead barrister labelling Malone's evidence as "incredible", "evasive" and unreliable.

The ISP's chief regulatory officer Steve Dalby did not fare much better in the film industry's closing submissions read to Justice Cowdroy in the copyright case this afternoon.

The film industry's lead barrister Tony Bannon attacked what he termed Malone's "extreme views" -that the Copyright Act should be modified or an industry code introduced before iiNet should be compelled to act on alleged infringement notifications.

Bannon claimed iiNet's approach in the case "was to deploy a variety and number of excuses" for not passing on the notices. The "excuses" included that passing on the notices would present a technical and cost burden for the ISP, he said.

He was also scathing of what he termed "persons not called", referring to the appearance of only Malone and Dalby as principle witnesses for cross-examination, rather than any of the ISP's technical or customer service resources to assist the court.

"The absence of witnesses who truly knew about the relevant topics put Mr Malone in the position in effect of having to provide evidence on subject matters on which he had no actual knowledge," Bannon claimed.

Nowhere was this more apparent than in iiNet's denials of knowledge of the inner-workings of the BitTorrent client or protocol, Bannon alleged.

"To put forward these two gentleman as the extent of familiarity of BitTorrent in the company is an entirely inaccurate picture of a company which plainly has a mass of technical expertise," Bannon submitted.

"It beggars belief that a company which paints itself as an internet pioneer doesn't have a level of knowledge within that company that knows exactly how the BitTorrent client works."

Bannon "respectfully" branded Malone's distinction that he understood the protocol rather than the client as "nonsense".

He said the issue of media releases in November last year as torrent files "added insult to injury.

"The company created its own torrent file and torrent tracker, which is accessible by someone who had a BitTorrent client," Bannon said.

"But you get the impression from these two witnesses BitTorrent was all a foreign area" with only "begrudging" admissions of what they knew, he said.

"It turns out the only people in this court room who can't engage in the most basic operation [of a BitTorrent client] are representatives of the ISP iiNet," Bannon said, raising his voice for emphasis.

"iiNet as a company perfectly understood the way BitTorrent works. That has been one of the great artifices iiNet has attempted to construct as a roadblock to a finding of authorisation in this case."

Bannon was equally scathing of Dalby's evidence, particularly that there was "not a single word [he] could give in evidence" to support Malone's assertion of the existence of a repeat infringer policy.

Malone was accused under cross-examination last week of having the policy only "in his head" - but he claimed that Dalby was also aware the policy existed.

"There was not a single word Mr Dalby could give in evidence to support the proposition that he ever had a single discussion with Mr Malone about a policy," Bannon submitted.

"[Malone] has no support from Mr Dalby on that issue.

"The silence on that front [in Dalby's evidence] is absolutely damning. The inference to be drawn is that no such policy exists."

The case continues. You can follow the case in-full here. For a background on the case, click here.


Day 17: Film industry attacks iiNet witness selection
 
 
 
Top Stories
NewSat defaults on $26m in overdue Lockheed payments
Jabiru-1 satellite build hits further hurdles.
 
IBM denies plans to cut 112k jobs
But admits to further restructuring.
 
ATO investigates 25 tech giants in tax hunt
Prepared to take tax evaders to court.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Franchisees, here's something you should know about
Jan 23, 2015
You need to know the Code if you are a franchisee or franchisor as the penalties are significant.
Xero users rejoice! Quoting has finally arrived
Jan 23, 2015
It has taken years, but Xero has at last added integrated quoting to its online accounting software.
You can now get a no-contract wi-fi tablet from Telstra
Jan 17, 2015
Telstra has began selling wi-fi tablets out of contract without paying extra for cellular ...
Get your business ready for 2015: mobile payments
Jan 2, 2015
These handy apps from MYOB, Xero and others can reduce your administrative load and improve ...
Xero prepares for key feature coming in 2015
Dec 19, 2014
Xero users will be able to track how their business is comparing to other Xero users.
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  36%
 
Your insurance company
  5%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  9%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  4%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  18%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  7%
TOTAL VOTES: 3030

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?

   |   View results
I support shutting down the OAIC.
  27%
 
I DON'T support shutting the OAIC.
  73%
TOTAL VOTES: 965

Vote