Centrelink takes in-house security tech to US

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Centrelink is to hold workshops in the United States and Australia in an attempt to have its in-house developed smartcard technology adopted as a world standard.

Two-day workshops are planned in Canberra in late June and Washington in July to introduce authentication technology specialists to Centrelink's PLAID protocol.

PLAID stands for 'Protocol for Lightweight Authentication of ID'.

Put simply, it is a smartcard authentication protocol that "specifies how components of a card-based ID authentication system 'talk' to each other".

Centrelink envisions the protocol may one day enable a user to have a single card for access to both buildings and machines (computers) in the workplace.

Developed in-house at Centrelink, the agency has made the protocol available free to the public in the hope a manufacturer will use it to build an off-the-shelf production system.

Centrelink's 27,000 staff currently use random number generators for access control, but the agency is migrating to a PKI certificate-based smart card system later this year.

In 2010, the agency is hoping it will be able to buy a commercial iteration of the PLAID application should one be developed.

The workshops are being held in conjunction with the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

Security techies with experience in the ISO/IEC 14443 and ISO/IEC 7816 smartcard standards are welcome to attend.

The Canberra session will take place on June 23 and 24 in Centrelink's Symonston office.


Centrelink takes in-house security tech to US
 
 
 
Top Stories
Can the ATO use IT to shed its old-school reputation?
Inside the ‘reinvention’ at the hands of new management.
 
JB Hi-Fi's new CIO gets 'clean slate' for change
New AusPost, Tabcorp exec to get his hands dirty.
 
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Should law enforcement be able to buy and use exploits?



   |   View results
Yes
  14%
 
No
  51%
 
Only in special circumstances
  18%
 
Yes, but with more transparency
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 833

Vote