iTnews

Legal status of virtual and hybrid AGMs a question, says ASIC

By Julian Bajkowski on Mar 20, 2020 12:00PM
Legal status of virtual and hybrid AGMs a question, says ASIC

Regulator to allow postponement until July.

Australia’s corporate cop has cautioned companies switching to virtual and hybrid annual general meetings to get around COVID-19 social distancing requirements that resolutions and votes made using the technological fix are still stuck in a legal grey area.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission on Friday issued notice to listed and unlisted companies that it would allow them to postpone AGMs until the end of July on the back of social gathering restrictions, with commissioner John Price also pressing the pause button on scheduled crackdowns.

Under normal circumstances companies would face stiff penalties and legal action in the event they failed to communicate details of AGMs to stakeholders or hold the meetings within a required period.

That’s now gone out the window.

At the same time, the outbreak of COVID-19 and its consequences have created a surge in demand for video conferencing and interactive meeting products and services as banks and businesses try to remain operational without coming into the office.

While the regulator doesn’t have an issue with electronic AGMs, it's cautioning companies and corporations to check whether they have already baked in the use of remote meetings technology into their constitutions because it may affect the legal standing of votes.

“ASIC considers that hybrid AGMs are permitted under the Corporations Act but entities need to check whether their constitution restricts meetings being held in this way. ASIC does not have the power to modify the Corporations Act to facilitate hybrid AGMs where they are not permitted under an entity’s constitution,” ASIC said in a bulletin.

“There is some doubt as to whether the Corporations Act permits virtual AGMs and there may also be doubt as to the validity of resolutions passed at a virtual AGM. ASIC does not have the power to modify the Corporations Act to facilitate virtual AGMs. However, we have provided a no-action position on virtual AGMs… Entities should also consider whether they can hold a virtual meeting under their constitution.”

While virtual AGMs might be increasingly popular with companies, they are not always popular with shareholders who increasingly relish the opportunity to roast directors face-to-face on an open microphone.

That’s especially the case when companies perform badly and older, long-term shareholders –frequently self-funded retirees – feel companies try to use technology to limit public criticism and stymie unpalatable questions for directors and office bearers.

ASIC is visibly wary of the potential for some companies trying to switch to virtual AGMs shutting out shareholders and members in the process, with the regulator saying it’s better to use its ‘no action’ penalty holiday on late meetings rather than trying to force them through online.

“Postponing an AGM where an entity has made advanced preparation may cause significant cost and inconvenience, but holding an AGM where few members can participate either in person or online might not comply with the Corporations Act and produce an unsatisfactory outcome,” ASIC said.

Entities that have a constitution that restricts on-line participation in an AGM or that cannot otherwise provide effective on-line participation for logistical or technical reasons can also rely on ASIC’s ‘no-action’ position for deferral of AGMs.

Got a news tip for our journalists? Share it with us anonymously here.
Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.
Tags:
agm asic corporations act finance financeit networking software strategy

Partner Content

Nestlé subsidiary sees sweet returns from data-driven transformation
Partner Content Nestlé subsidiary sees sweet returns from data-driven transformation
Beat the DDoS blackmails in 2021
Promoted Content Beat the DDoS blackmails in 2021
What is zero trust cybersecurity?
Partner Content What is zero trust cybersecurity?
What conversations should executives be having about cyber security?
Partner Content What conversations should executives be having about cyber security?

Sponsored Whitepapers

Is the technology refresh dead?
Is the technology refresh dead?
DevSecOps: A framework for digital innovation
DevSecOps: A framework for digital innovation
Encryption: Protect your most critical data
Encryption: Protect your most critical data
Overcoming data security challenges in a hybrid, multicloud world
Overcoming data security challenges in a hybrid, multicloud world
Move beyond passwords
Move beyond passwords

Events

  • On-Demand Webinar: How Poly and Microsoft are Embracing Future Work Environments
  • [Webinar] - Transformation versus compliance – a guide for CXOs
  • Masters of Microsoft Licensing
By Julian Bajkowski
Mar 20 2020
12:00PM
0 Comments

Related Articles

  • AMP 'turbocharges' its IT transformation agenda
  • CBA sued by ASIC for allegedly overcharging customers
  • CommSec says IT and coding issues partly behind ASIC case
  • CBA continues expansion of engineering team
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Whatsapp Email A Friend

Most Read Articles

Vodafone hit by nationwide 4G outage

Vodafone hit by nationwide 4G outage

NAB's chief data officer Glenda Crisp leaves bank

NAB's chief data officer Glenda Crisp leaves bank

Westpac to offer smartphone-based identity verification group-wide

Westpac to offer smartphone-based identity verification group-wide

TPG, Optus, Nokia to shape national emergency mobile broadband network

TPG, Optus, Nokia to shape national emergency mobile broadband network

You must be a registered member of iTnews to post a comment.
Log In | Register
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form without prior authorisation.
Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of nextmedia's Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.