iTnews

Boeing to ensure 787's flight control system can't be hacked by passengers

By Jack Rogers on Jan 8, 2008 4:05PM
Boeing to ensure 787's flight control system can't be hacked by passengers

The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is requiring Boeing to make sure that computers governing flight control systems on the new 787 are not vulnerable to hacking from passengers using in-flight internet access.

In a notification published in the Federal Register on Jan. 2, FAA said the Seattle-based aircraft builder must address this concern before the new jet, called the "Dreamliner," is certified for commercial use beginning in July.

However, the federal agency has not implemented a request from the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) that Boeing provide 787 flight crews with the means to disable passengers' ability to connect with the aircraft's computer system.

The computer network in the passenger compartment of the 787-8 aircraft is the first in the industry designed to give passengers in-flight web access, but it also is connected to the plane's control, navigation and communication systems, according to the FAA notification.

"These novel or unusual design features are associated with the connectivity of the passenger domain computer systems to the airplane's critical systems and data networks. For these design features, the applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for protection and security [of systems and networks] against unauthorized data," the notification stated.

In its Jan. 2 report, the FAA issued final "special conditions" for certification of the 787 requiring Boeing to ensure that the aircraft's design prevents "all inadvertent or malicious changes to, and all adverse impacts upon, all systems, network, hardware, software and data in the Aircraft Control Domain and in the Airline Information Domain from all points within the Passenger Information and Entertainment Domain."

The FAA, which has been soliciting industry comments on the proposed special conditions since April, did not require Boeing to implement an urgent request from the ALPA "that a backup means must also be provided for the flight crew to disable passengers' ability to connect to [specific flight control] systems."

The FAA instead noted that its conditions do not preclude Boeing from building in a manual or automatic override, and said it "would prefer not to dictate specific design features to [Boeing] but rather to allow [it] the flexibility to determine the appropriate security protections and means to address all potential vulnerabilities and risks posed by allowing this access."

Boeing's main competitor, Airbus, also commented on the proposed conditions, stating that they failed to precisely define the three domains governed by the 787's computer system and that the conditions imply a "zero tolerance" regarding breaches that would be "impossible" to comply with during the life cycle of the aircraft "because security threats evolve...rapidly."

According to the FAA notification, Airbus preferred "a less categorical requirement which allows more flexibility and does not prevent possible residual vulnerabilities if they are assessed as acceptable from a safety point of view."

FAA said in the notification that it will be working closely with EUROCAE (European Organisation for Civil Aviation Equipment) and RTCA (formerly the Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics) to develop additional aircraft network-security guidelines for a compliance standard on future aircraft certification programs.
Got a news tip for our journalists? Share it with us anonymously here.
Tags:
787s be boeing by cant control ensure faa flight hacked passengers security system to

Partner Content

One way SD-WAN can save business leaders' time
Partner Content One way SD-WAN can save business leaders' time
Setting a path to self-funded mainframe-to-cloud modernisation with Micro Focus
Promoted Content Setting a path to self-funded mainframe-to-cloud modernisation with Micro Focus
Why companies fail at picking cloud modernisation partners
Promoted Content Why companies fail at picking cloud modernisation partners
Beat the DDoS blackmails in 2021
Promoted Content Beat the DDoS blackmails in 2021

Sponsored Whitepapers

Is the technology refresh dead?
Is the technology refresh dead?
DevSecOps: A framework for digital innovation
DevSecOps: A framework for digital innovation
Encryption: Protect your most critical data
Encryption: Protect your most critical data
Overcoming data security challenges in a hybrid, multicloud world
Overcoming data security challenges in a hybrid, multicloud world
Move beyond passwords
Move beyond passwords

Events

  • On-Demand Webinar: How Poly and Microsoft are Embracing Future Work Environments
  • [Webinar] - Transformation versus compliance – a guide for CXOs
  • Masters of Microsoft Licensing
By Jack Rogers
Jan 8 2008
4:05PM
0 Comments

Related Articles

  • Google hit with nearly $1m privacy fine in Belgium
  • Boeing Australia debuts first locally built 'Loyal Wingman' defence drone
  • Vic govt names hospitals, health services to share in $30m IT funding
  • Civil groups want EU lawmakers to boost privacy rights in planned WhatsApp, Skype rules
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Whatsapp Email A Friend

Most Read Articles

Aussie Broadband to white label its services

Aussie Broadband to white label its services

Vodafone hit by nationwide 4G outage

Vodafone hit by nationwide 4G outage

ATO loses its cyber security chief

ATO loses its cyber security chief

Virgin Australia rebuilds its IT leadership team

Virgin Australia rebuilds its IT leadership team

You must be a registered member of iTnews to post a comment.
Log In | Register
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form without prior authorisation.
Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of nextmedia's Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.