Why you should oppose a data breach notification law

By on
Why you should oppose a data breach notification law

Opinion: Data breach notification was a good idea - a decade ago.

Dear Attorney-General, please get on with it, and submit a Bill to create a privacy right of action.

Added to that, we need criminal offences on the statute books for serious and/or repeated failures to implement security safeguards commensurate with the sensitivity of the data.

But all that mandatory data breach notification – raised in your Discussion Paper this week – does is expose the fact that organisations are culpably cavalier with sensitive data, and fail to implement well-understood security safeguards.

And, um, we know that already.

Privacy advocates and security specialists alike are opposed to mandatory data breach reporting. The reason is that it's being used as an excuse to hold off what is now clearly necessary.

Consider what it took for mandatory data breach notification to get to where it is today.

In 2003, California passed a Security Breach Notification Law, requiring that Californian consumers be notified when sensitive personal data about them is illegitimately obtained from a server or database.

A total of 34 states adopted similar laws by 2006, prompting Australia's Privacy Commissioner at the time to recommend such a law be passed in Australia.

By 2012, the Australian Law Reform Commission had studied the question for 2 years, the government had cogitated for 4 years, and, just this week, the Attorney-General took "decisive action" by releasing a Discussion Paper.

So it looks like we can expect a draft bill by 2014, assuming the Government is re-elected and the initiative doesn't get lost somewhere.

The bill will likely pass in 2015 and come in to force in 2016. But it won't be until 2019, perhaps, that the Privacy Commissioner is embarrassed into dropping its established practice of warning miscreants to actually impose sanctions.

Data breach notification was a good idea – a decade ago.

Roger Clarke is Principal of Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd, a Visiting Professor in at UNSW and ANU, Chair of the Australian Privacy Foundation and a Director of the Internet Society of Australia.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.
Tags:

Most Read Articles

You must be a registered member of iTnews to post a comment.
| Register

Poll

How should the costs of Australia's piracy scheme be split?
Rights holders should foot the whole bill
50/50
ISPs should foot the whole bill
Government should chip in a bit
Other
Flash is heading towards its grave, and that's...
Great! Good riddance
Sad! Flash had some good qualities
Irrelevant. I don't care
What's Flash?
View poll archive

Whitepapers from our sponsors

What will the stadium of the future look like?
What will the stadium of the future look like?
New technology adoption is pushing enterprise networks to breaking point
New technology adoption is pushing enterprise networks to breaking point
Gartner names IBM a 'Leader' for Disaster Recovery as a Service
Gartner names IBM a 'Leader' for Disaster Recovery as a Service
The next era of business continuity: Are you ready for an always-on world?
The next era of business continuity: Are you ready for an always-on world?

Log In

Username:
Password:
|  Forgot your password?