Treaties committee recommends delay to ACTA

By on
Treaties committee recommends delay to ACTA
Parliament House, Canberra

Wants copyright reform first.

The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement has received another blow to international acceptance, with a parliamentary committee recommending the Australian Government delay its ratification until the end of 2013.

In its final report tabled to Parliament today, the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties recommended the Government conduct an independent and transparent cost/benefit analysis of the agreement.

It also urged the Government hold off on ratifying the treaty until the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) complete its inquiry into copyright reform.

The commission is due to report on copyright at the end of November 2013, meaning the Government would have to wait more than a year to ratify the treaty if it adopts the committee's recommendation.

The joint standing committee argued "it is prudent to await the outcomes of this inquiry as they will better inform the Committee's future deliberations on ACTA's ratification".

"The Committee considers that it would be wise to adopt a conservative approach to ratification of this treaty. If this is the future of copyright and IP regulation," it noted.

"Copyright and IP holders in Australia will not be best served if the treaty is ratified by Australia and a handful of others, but is not compatible with the copyright and IP regimes applicable in major creative centres as the United States and Europe."

The ALRC inquiry's draft terms were notably constrained to consideration of existing international treaties as well as "proposed international obligations", such as ACTA and the covertly drafted Transpacific Partnership Agreement.

The committee also sought several clarifications and assurances from the Federal Government on treaty wording, in the event the treaty was ratified.

It urged the Government to prepare legislation to exclude patents from the treaty's proposed civil enforcement and border measures, and ensure products produced in Australia are not subject to counterfeiting prohibitions in ACTA.

Australian opponents to the treaty have warned of the new powers the treaty would afford intellectual property rights holders, while providing no real economic or social benefit to Australia.

However, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade — which leads the Australian delegation to treaty negotiations — sought to downplay the effect the treaty would have on Australia.

The treaty's progress has faced setbacks globally after five European committees all rejected its ratification. The European Union is expected to finally vote on the issue next month.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.
Tags:

Most Read Articles

You must be a registered member of iTnews to post a comment.
| Register

Poll

How should the costs of Australia's piracy scheme be split?
Rights holders should foot the whole bill
50/50
ISPs should foot the whole bill
Government should chip in a bit
Other
Flash is heading towards its grave, and that's...
Great! Good riddance
Sad! Flash had some good qualities
Irrelevant. I don't care
What's Flash?
View poll archive

Whitepapers from our sponsors

What will the stadium of the future look like?
What will the stadium of the future look like?
New technology adoption is pushing enterprise networks to breaking point
New technology adoption is pushing enterprise networks to breaking point
Gartner names IBM a 'Leader' for Disaster Recovery as a Service
Gartner names IBM a 'Leader' for Disaster Recovery as a Service
The next era of business continuity: Are you ready for an always-on world?
The next era of business continuity: Are you ready for an always-on world?

Log In

Username:
Password:
|  Forgot your password?