Android less secure, Microsoft says

By on
Android less secure, Microsoft says

Open source, fragmentation deemed problems.

Microsoft has taken aim at Google's increasingly popular Android operating system that is powering a large number of low-cost portable devices such as tablets and mobile phones, saying it is not as safe as Windows and less productive.

In a "discussion document" [PDF] published today, Microsoft said Android was behind Windows in four areas critical for the government and educational sectors, namely ease of use, security, productivity and life cycle.

Microsoft said while the Linux kernel used in Android receives security patches and fixes regularly, Google and its original equipment manufacturers did not update older versions of Android leaving them vulnerable to new and old security threats.

Citing an example of Taiwanese handset maker HTC signing the Android bootloader so that only its firmware would run on the company's devices, Microsoft said open source was by itself a problem.

"The open source nature of Android is touted by Google as a feature, not a bug, but the hackable nature of Android continues to leave big potential security holes," Microsoft claimed.

At present, Google's own figures differ from Microsoft's claim that more than half of Android devices run version 2.x or older.

Android platforms September 2013; source: Google
Android platforms September 2013; source: Google
However, Google's numbers exclude Android versions older than 2.2. Those do not run the Play Store app that is used to gauge which versions of the operating systems are used, based on active visits to the store.
Android vendors also skip updates or stop updating less popular devices altogether, leaving users in a limbo, Microsoft claimed, further worsening the security problems.
Growing numbers of Android malware was also cited as a reason why the Google operating system was less secure than Windows.
Microsoft said its app store process of prescreening and vetting software was similar to Apple's, and provided solid protection against malware, and that Windows devices received timely automatic updates and came with security software.
Furthermore, Android contained other companies' intellectual property Microsoft said and therefore could not be used royalty-free in devices.
Microsoft, which has signed licensing deals with more than twenty Android manufacturers, is estimated to earn around US$8 in royalties per device sold, bringing in some US$3.4 billion for the company this year alone.
Summary of Microsoft's arguments as to why Windows beats
Android in government and educational areas.

Productivity and integration with existing devices were other areas where Microsoft said Android failed, but its solutions excelled.

"Windows devices take user productivity to a new level", Microsoft boasted, citing its Office suite, side-by-side multitasking using the Snap feature as well as accurate stylus input and support for multiple displays.

Although Android devices are cheaper to acquire, Microsoft said the solution cost of devices "will look quite different in the end, as there are many other costs that are likely to incur during the lifcycle of the device".

Despite the claims of inferiority in the document, Android is approaching eighty per cent market share currently, pushing aside its competitors such as Apple's iOS.

Microsoft, which pioneered smartphones running its Windows Mobile family of operating systems that are unsupported as of three years ago, has just 3.7 per cent of the market in comparison with the newer Windows Phone OS.

The company is also struggling to make inroads into the tablet device market. In July Microsoft said it would take nearly a billion dollar write down for the Surface RT tablet, which has sold poorly since it was launched.

Copyright © . All rights reserved.

Most Read Articles

Log In

|  Forgot your password?