Newsletter:

Skip Navigation LinksHome > News > Telecommunications > Opinion: The monopoly we had to have

Opinion: The monopoly we had to have

By Ian Yates
11 September 2008 07:45AM
Tags: terria | nbn | telstra

News that the Terria consortium wants the NBN to be a separate entity owned by "we the people" is being construed by Telstra as nothing more than sour grapes because Terria isn’t going to get the gig.

Well, maybe that’s true. If you can’t win the war, sue for peace as soon as possible and a share of the reparations.

However, Terria conflicts of interest not withstanding, it really isn’t in anyone’s interest for any one private entity to own and control our nation’s broadband future. And we just aren’t big enough to have a half a dozen NBNs all competing with one another.

Heck, we can’t even manage to get three airlines up and competing properly, so it’s probably time to pay more attention to the way things are done in countries with similar populations to our own.

For too long we’ve based all our ideas of when things should be public and when they should be private on what happens in the USA and the UK, which both have massive numbers of people demanding services for which the business world can compete.

Of course we can afford to be choosy – no need to pick the first place with 20m souls and emulate them – plenty of tin-pot dictatorships satisfy that simple criteria. But there are plenty of European nations doing remarkably well with a sensible mixture of public and private investment in networks.

We do seem to like punching well above our weight on the international scene, particularly in the sporting arena, but surely that doesn’t mean we have to be over-achievers at everything on the global agenda.

Even the good ol’ USA has stopped short of some of our own headlong rushes into “private good, public bad and pillory anyone who argues against it” territory.

We’ve seen this up close and personal recently in NSW as the government imploded while trying to sell the power stations to … nobody really … the market for coal-fired electricity generators has shrunk to the size of a

Haldron particle in the face of rising tides and higher sales of sun block.
So how about ending the verbals between Telstra and the other telcos with some government leadership?

Sure, we have to pay to get network built, so pay for it we must, but let’s not let any single telco hold us to ransom with future bleating about return on investment, shareholders’ demands and executive bonuses.

This thing is far too important for that.

   


Ads by Google


Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Comments: 6
You have hit the nail on the head -we do not want to get held to ransom/ gouged/ preyed on etc once again - especialy where our tax dollars have once again gone into a network.

One correction though - all councils/ municipalities/ states/ Utiliites will probably grimly tolerate the installation of the "first" NBN. I do not see that extending to a second or third. This is a once off chance to get it right, with a public money assisting both directly and indirectly via your rates, your inconvenience at having roads dug up and so on - I do not beleive there will ever be a second or a third.

iTnews - comments icon Posted by RossSep 11, 2008 9:42 AM
It seems that the Australian govt is more concerned about the opinion of business rather than the what's good for the people of this country.

after all 'we the people' pay them to rule for us, not for the corporations who always seem to get whatever they demand at the expense of the public at large.

iTnews - comments icon Posted by DarylSep 11, 2008 9:53 AM
The Australian Government is most concerned what the ACTU wants - and they DEMAND that Telstra be handed the keys to the monopoly NBN treasure chest, because Telstra is such a proven monopolist and customer gouger.

I wouldn't trust Telstra to mind its manners let alone mind the NBN in the interests of the punters.

iTnews - comments icon Posted by MikeSep 11, 2008 12:26 PM
Hey Mike..I think actaully its "Tierra" thats the so called monopolist.........Telstra is all for OPEN ACESS!!
iTnews - comments icon Posted by mickSep 11, 2008 12:32 PM
Poor mick.

In view of Telstra's history of impeding competition on the newtork it controls, your comment is truly sad.

iTnews - comments icon Posted by DavidBSep 11, 2008 2:33 PM
Telstra's internal nepotism let alone the other myriad of reasons, should exclude it form owning this infrastructure. Optus have not invested in large network infrastructure for years. AAPT are struggling with the day to day cost of running a network and where never serious of investing a cent. The NBN needs to be owned and managed by another government organisation that treats all the players equally.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by RealistOct 24, 2008 1:53 PM
Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 






iTnews 2009 Job Survey

TopTopics
(7264) -  top
(3131) -  microsoft
(2311) -  broadband
(2210) -  content
(2150) -  company
(2118) -  data
(1927) -  terria
(1863) -  isp
(1811) -  nbn
(1720) -  telstra
(1712) -  filtering
(1581) -  internode
(1538) -  voip
(1439) -  centre
(1148) -  consumers