Newsletter:

Skip Navigation LinksHome > News > Business > 'Web 2.0 University' to launch in A/NZ

'Web 2.0 University' to launch in A/NZ

By Liz Tay
18 August 2008 01:32PM
Tags: web | training | web | directions | acidlabs

Social media startup, acidlabs, has partnered with a U.S.-based consultancy to bring 'Web 2.0 University' to Australia and New Zealand.

Founded by Dion Hinchcliffe of the U.S. consultancy Hinchcliffe & Company, Web 2.0 University comprises a series of workshops that are targeted at enterprise and start-up companies.

Previously, workshops have been delivered to product managers, executives, and architects in Europe and the U.S., and focus on how to design next generation online products and services.

Workshops in Australia and New Zealand will be customised for the local market and will feature local case studies alongside tried and tested international content.

Acidlabs founder Stephen Collins highlighted application developer Tangler and implant company Cochlear as potential local case studies.

“I can imagine we might look at something like Tangler or Cochlear because they’re innovative local companies that may make the most interesting case studies,” he told iTnews.

Despite its name, Web 2.0 University is not a tertiary education institute, nor does it provide any accreditations.

Collins said that the Web 2.0 University brand of workshops has been registered in the U.S., and acidlabs has enlisted legal counsel to determine if their use of the word ‘University’ is permitted in Australia.

“We’re obviously not a real University and obviously don’t offer any accreditations,” he said.

“What we offer is headspace to show organisations how they can engage with clients using these tools, and [discuss] the uptake of collaboration inside the wall.”

“There’s a growing desire for organisations to understand these things. I think the demand is probably pretty high,” he said.

Collins expects to deliver two to three workshops per year at events, through hosting partner Web Directions, in addition to on-premise workshops that will be held as per organisations’ demand.

Web 2.0 University will make its Australian debut on 23 September, in conjunction with the Web Directions South conference.

The first Web Directions workshop will cost $450 to attend and subsequent workshops will be priced at ‘market rates’. For comparison, Web 2.0 University in the U.S. is priced at US$895 per workshop.

   


Ads by Google


Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Comments: 1
The renowned Gartner Group's latest Hype Cycle report places "Web 2.0" in a "Trough of Disillusionment":

http://tinyurl.com/6ycvs8

But for a few good chuckles, I suggest you Google the following and browse the first 20-30 listings:

failures Gartner Group
warnings Gartner Group
Gartner Group expects
Gartner Group predicts

As for "Web 2.0?, like so many tech articles posted since Tim O'Reilly (or was it Dale Dougherty?) first coined the term in 2004 (or was it 2005?), this one references "Web 2.0" as if it were something tangible--or at least a concept with clear, concise definition. It is not. In 2006, Web founder Sir Tim Berners-Lee sagely observed that "nobody knows what it means":

http://tinyurl.com/y6ewzy

In 2007, Michael Wesch put together this video that supposedly "explains what Web 2.0 really is about":

http://tinyurl.com/6pdz2q

It is a cool video. But the message is all about XML and how it can be used to separate form and content. There was no mention of CSS and XHTML, but no matter. I was writing XML parsers in the '90s, and XHTML/CSS web design pre-dates "Web 2.0" as well.

And now in 2008, the most honest thing we can say is that "Web 2.0" means whatever the techno-marketeer (ab)using it wants it to mean. Otherwise, why would intelligent people like Isaac O'Bannon still be writing articles asking "What is Web 2.0?":

http://tinyurl.com/5solok

And, why would McKinsey's just-released best-of-breed report entitled "Building the Web 2.0 Enterprise" ...

http://tinyurl.com/6sxls7

... include no attempt at defining the term other than to list the "Web 2.0 Tools" that comprise or enable it? And even there, the chief ingredient is identified only as "Web Services", adding more mystery to the mix as one ethereal term is offered up to explain another.

As originated in an Onstartups.com website design posting...

http://tinyurl.com/576sgs

... "Web 2.0" is like pornography: Nobody has defined it; you just have to know it when you see it.

Bruce Arnold, Web Design Miami Florida
http://www.PervasivePersuasion.com
iTnews - comments icon Posted by WebDesignMiamiAug 18, 2008 5:58 PM
Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 






Unified Communications Podcast Centre

TopTopics
(6934) -  microsoft
(6474) -  iinet
(6465) -  copyright
(6465) -  afact
(6353) -  internet
(5920) -  servers
(5920) -  mipi
(4088) -  phone
(4083) -  telstra
(3657) -  nvidia
(3343) -  broadband
(3286) -  nbn
(2430) -  avg
(1970) -  onecare
(1886) -  google