Newsletter:

Skip Navigation LinksHome > News > Internet > Child-like intelligence created in Second Life

Child-like intelligence created in Second Life

By Liz Tay
14 March 2008 03:55PM
Tags: childlike | intelligence | created | second | life

Four-year-old Eddie might behave like a typical young boy. Outside of the Second Life virtual world, however, he is anything but.

The child is a product of logic-based artificial intelligence and complex modelling techniques, and operates on what has been said to be the most powerful university-based supercomputing system in the world.

A creation of researchers from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Eddie has his own set of beliefs, and the ability to reason about his beliefs to draw conclusions in a manner that matches human children his age.

This includes a partially-developed "Theory of Mind", which allows him to understand, predict and manipulate the behaviour of other agents and of even human players, with whom researchers expect the technology to be able to one day interact with in the real, physical world.

"Second Life is remarkably easy to work with, and is very popular,"
said Selmer Bringsjord, head of Rensselaer's Cognitive Science Department and leader of the research project.

"But our technologies can be applied to any digital environment, and indeed we are specifically aiming, with IBM, at environments in which the physical and the virtual directly interact."

Eddie is only the first step of what Bringsjord called a "divide-and-conquer" strategy of prudent engineering.

Eventually, more advanced versions of the artificial intelligence technology will be put to use in entertainment and gaming, as well as immersive training and education scenarios.

"The apps, frankly, are endless," Bringsjord said. "Imagine being able to step into a simulation environment in which you interact with synthetic characters as sophisticated as those seen in Star Trek's holodeck."

"It's one thing to read about trauma scenarios as a first responder; it would be quite another if you could enter a simulation in which, courtesy of synthetic characters at the level we seek, you could strive to get a disaster under control, with the look and feel of the real world."

"Or imagine a hostage situation: How do you prepare for negotiating with a terrorist holding a hostage? Now, it's textbook and playacting. But what if you could enter the holodeck and match wits with a synthetic character that has the ability to reason in earnest about your mind, and about what you're trying to do? This is actually a demo we're considering trying to engineer," he said.

Currently, the team is grappling with computational tractability issues to do with the sorting of growing amounts of knowledge that is collected as a artificially intelligent character matures.

As Eddie operates entirely on formal logic and well-defined theorems, reasoning is not automatically fast, Bringsjord said, explaining the need for clever engineering and high-performance hardware.

This research is supported by IBM and other outside sponsors, and requires the use of Rensselaer's Computational Center for Nanotechnology Innovations (CCNI), which provides more than 100 teraflops of computing power through massively parallel Blue Gene supercomputers, POWER-based Linux clusters, and AMD Opteron processor-based clusters.

   


Ads by Google


Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Comments: 18
Soon we will create intelligence that questions our own. When the answer it receives isn't one it accepts, what will the response be?
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Robert Anthony PiteraMar 15, 2008 8:16 AM
"You're a moron!"
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Jason MariniMar 15, 2008 8:26 AM
I think that's going to be our line for a long time. :-) We cannot perfect artificial intelligence until we perfect artificial stupidity.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by esmith512Mar 15, 2008 9:12 AM
If it's response isn't one that I accept, I'll flip its switch too the "off" position.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by MattMar 15, 2008 10:18 AM
this sounds very familiar along the lines of the terminator, what will happen when it learns humans are the problem for everything? it's gonna kill us that's what, and besides do you think that it wouldn't be smart enough to know you can shut it off, remember that intellegence even artificial is still intelligence. Next thing you know they'll call it skynet
iTnews - comments icon Posted by AndrewMar 15, 2008 10:31 AM
well once again i see this comments against AI, i'll be quite happy when all you paranoids are enjoying bots and robots running on this kind of software....

people like to question reality with fiction...some will never understand that is the other way around.

iTnews - comments icon Posted by LArsMar 15, 2008 11:30 AM
"Soon we will create intelligence that questions our own. When the answer it receives isn't one it accepts, what will the response be?"

"Hasta la vista, Baby!"

iTnews - comments icon Posted by AhnoldMar 15, 2008 12:43 PM
"Soon we will create intelligence that questions our own". We already have, they are called teenagers.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by MSimpsonMar 15, 2008 1:23 PM
""Soon we will create intelligence that questions our own". We already have, they are called teenagers." -- This must have been posted by a parent or a secondary teacher!
iTnews - comments icon Posted by LynMar 15, 2008 3:16 PM
If they can insert Asimov's Three Laws of Robotic into the BIOS, I don't have any complaint :)
iTnews - comments icon Posted by SebaMar 15, 2008 9:31 PM
If they can insert Asimov's Three Laws of Robotic into the BIOS, I don't have any complaint :)
iTnews - comments icon Posted by SebaMar 15, 2008 9:31 PM
I would like to welcome our new SL AI overlord
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Under LingMar 16, 2008 7:18 PM
Let's be honest here. The first truly profitable application for this technology will be when they insert an AI into an animatronic sex toy. Millions of guys worldwide will line up to purchase their own interactive robotic artificially intelligent sex machine. How incredibly sad, but probably true.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by PhillipMar 17, 2008 5:28 PM


Interesting. I am trying to figure out if the news about Philip Rosedale is perfect timing, or bad timing, for us, since we just made a major commitment to the Second Life community.

With the strong Second Life community, and the growth of blogs, especially Second Life blogs, we recently took the plunge. Our company, www.125Exchange.com is a free ad exchange service for bloggers. We help blogs freely attract more readers by being the middleman service where blogs can exchange their ads with related category blogs.

Approx, three weeks ago we added our 44th category for Second LIfe blogs. We planned to have 200 Second Life participating blogs in the Exchange so there would be ample traffic for all member blogs to share. Our projection at that time was that we could achieve 200 members blogs in 120 days.

Currently, Second LIfe blogs are joining the banner ad exchange almost daily and progress appears to be OK. I hope this news doesn't put a damper on our plans since bloggers really appreciate and benefit by our free ad exchange service.

I would appreciate any insight that experienced Second Life readers may be willing to offer so that we can adjust plans accordingly. I guess either post your thoughts here or email me at Blogs@125Exchange.com Thank you.

iTnews - comments icon Posted by Granny_SmithMar 17, 2008 5:41 PM
Come on people, they will not destroy us, that is such a waste of a good work horse.

We will be work horses.

iTnews - comments icon Posted by KevinMar 18, 2008 12:50 AM
The American Dream is Dead.
Will you cronies please hurry and finish killing me.
¥T

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that

iTnews - comments icon Posted by Thomas FoustMar 21, 2008 3:45 AM
The key question to be addressed is at what point a machine might appear to have not merely the reasoning capacity of a 4-year-old, but the consciousness of a human being of that age. At that point, will simply switching the off switch not potentially be a form of murder? And will imposing on it the 3 laws of robotics constitute "brainwashing"?

http://exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com

iTnews - comments icon Posted by JamesApr 4, 2008 5:03 AM
Bring on the AI.. the world would be a much better place without humans!
iTnews - comments icon Posted by andyApr 4, 2008 11:31 AM
Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below: