Newsletter:

Skip Navigation LinksHome > News > Security > EFA attacks Labor’s ‘clean-feed’ Internet proposal

EFA attacks Labor’s ‘clean-feed’ Internet proposal

By Lilia Guan
3 January 2008 07:32AM
Tags: efa | attacks | labor’s | ‘cleanfeed’ | internet | proposal

Independent industry body, the Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) has savaged a plan by the Labor Government plan, (championed by Communications Minister Stephen Conroy) to "clean feed" filtered Internet connections to all homes and schools.

According to the EFA the mandate will “supposedly censor” the Internet of pornography and other "inappropriate material", however it goes further than the Liberal’s policies, by requiring individuals to opt-out of the scheme rather than request filtering from their service provider.

EFA chair, Dale Clapperton said waving the 'save the children' flag may be good politics, but it ignores serious technological problems which will likely cause the proposed scheme to fail.

"Furthermore, Australia is supposed to be a liberal democracy where adults have the freedom to say and read what they want, not just what the Government decides is 'appropriate' for them."

Clapperton said these announcements smack of the condescending paternalism which contributed to the downfall of the Howard government.

"The proposals threaten the free speech rights of every Australian, and our concerns will not be silenced by Government sound bites equating free speech with access to child pornography," he said.

However Senator Conroy makes no apologies for the development.

“If people equate freedom of speech with watching child pornography, then the Rudd-Labor Government is going to disagree,” he said.

The EFA believes that child pornography is already illegal, and very unlikely to come to the attention of either the casual web user or the censors themselves, said Clapperton.

He also believes that implementation of the proposal, would cause significant technical and administrative headaches for Australia's Internet Service Providers.

"This can only have the effect of making Australians' access to the internet slower and more expensive," he said. "Given the Prime Minister's election promise to focus on improving the nation's access to broadband, the fact that the first measures put in place should do the exact opposite is as disappointing as it is bewildering."

However Conroy said the Government’s proposal will not grind the Internet to a halt. However he has yet to explain to Internet engineers what the plans are to accomplish the plans.

"Anyone with a better understanding of the Internet than the Minister will tell you this system simply will not work," said Clapperton. "But a lot of taxpayers' money will be wasted if we try."

The EFA supports measures to provide filtering software to homes where it is requested, and to educate parents on monitoring their children's online activities.

"Unfortunately, ISP based filtering will not make the Internet safe for children, and may even cause harm in and of itself. If parents are deceived into believing that a 'filtered' Internet service is safe for children, they will be less likely to take sensible precautions such as supervising their children while they use the Internet," he said.

At a time when all sides of politics acknowledge the importance of developing our information economy, EFA feels that this announcement sends the wrong message to the rest of the world.

"The Coalition was rightly ridiculed by the rest of the world when they announced in the late 1990's that they would censor Australian's Internet access. The Coalition, at least, sensibly realised that their proposals were technologically infeasible. It seems that the current Minister with responsibility for the Internet has yet to learn that lesson."

While the debate rages on about how best to create a safe online environment for children, a Melbourne man was arrested on Christmas Eve for allegedly having in his possession 16,000 child pornography files.

The Australian Federal Police (AFP) allegedly found the images on the man's laptop computer when he arrived in Australia on a flight from China. He was detained at Melbourne airport as the result of a tip-off to the AFP's Online
Child Sex Exploitation Team.

Police examined the man’s computer and allegedly found more than 16,000 files depicting images and videos of child pornography. An external hard drive allegedly containing similar images. Video footage was also seized.

AFP agents then executed a search warrant at the man’s house in Bentleigh. Additional computers, hard drives, USB drives and CD files were seized, all of which are currently the subject of forensic testing.

The 40-year-old was charged with importing child pornography and possession of child pornography. The maximum penalty for these offences is 10 years imprisonment.

   


Ads by Google


Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Comments: 12
It would appear that the PM has the same poor advisors that Helen did.
Let Labour have their day in the sunshine and be the laughting stock of the world. As an aside, how many of you parents know anything about computers?
Mike
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Michael SquiresJan 3, 2008 5:59 PM
Ugh, this is disgusting. I should be able to look at whatever the hell I WANT. Of course some content is illegal (is child pron) and with good reason, but I am an adult and no one should be filtering my internet (which I pay for!) at all.

If parents can't take charge of their children and don't know what is going on, then they should just go get sterilised right now and save us paying internet users the trouble that their dumb kids are causing.

Don't know what your kid is doing online?? LEARN!

I'll keep my unlimited access to anything I like, thanks.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by LaurenJan 3, 2008 8:12 PM
The internet is NOT a playground for children. Parents need to not only stop treating it like one and also be honest and open about the 'dangers' of the net.

I was brought up knowing about acceptability and internet safety; something that appears to be lacking nowadays. Now as an adult, i'm ashamed at my peers for not doing to their kids what was done to me.
Have you seen how adept teenagers are? They don't have to be a script-kiddy; Any determined 15 year old will get past the thing in 30 minutes. Wasting time and money on this scheme is not an option.

I'm all for the 'capital' solution for the sick freaks publishing the content they want to stop though!
iTnews - comments icon Posted by WIsian Lundstr0mJan 3, 2008 9:42 PM
While the idea or making illegal content not accessible sounds right, there are other considerations which should be research better before such a programme is announced. There are two aspects which may make this totally unworkable. A: Technical, where it is suggested to move from distributed filtering (using power of local processors on thousands of desktops) to centralised (using processing power of central devices at providers colocation facitities). And certainly to make it works, Government may wish to run research programmes on intelligent graphics recognition (the programme to be successful needs not only to block words or sites, but also inappropriate images). I can assure you that this will take a lot of money and central processing power - and the outcome will be more than dissatisfactory. Who will be funding those massive developments? Well, customers will pay increased price for already too expensive service (comparing to Europe, we are paying at least twice too much for Internet access). B: Government is suggesting that central filtering managed by the Government policy is good for us. Having such a power and devices in place on the network, it may be tempting to add a few more filters blocking other content. This may lead to dangerous situation when the only independent media (Internet) will loose its core value. And in opinions of many, this is may be the main driver of the exercise.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Andrew (CPEng, IEEE consultant)Jan 4, 2008 9:15 AM
I for one oppose the Government run "clean filter". For starters, who is going to decide what is appropriate material? As adults, we know what is illegal, in this case child pornography.

All this appears to be is a way for the government to control what we as free people can look at. Once the filter is in place, who says that they will not add additional items onto the "blacklist"?

Each parent has a different way of raising their child, from what they can and can't view on the internet, much the same as what type of programs they can watch on the television.

What next? Government censored tv? Radio? Newspapers?

As an IT Licensing Specialist, I know that the government will charge ISP's to use this software, which will increase the cost of an already overpriced broadband system, and make it slower to use. How many companies which use the internet as their primary business are going to suffer?

They need to do their research before they go out and start making these outrageous plans.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Cory (Licensing Specialist)Jan 4, 2008 10:06 AM
China is an example of a country who supervises internet usage.

Do you want to be a communist?
iTnews - comments icon Posted by well slap me and call me chinaJan 5, 2008 2:27 PM
This is ridicules.

The last time I checked Australia was suppose to be a democracy where which we can see, read, listen & discuss anything & anything we want, providing that it doesn’t fall outside the law. Now I hear that the newly elected Labor party have decided the partially follow in the steps of the Socialist Republic of China by considering this so-called ‘Clean Feed’. Does Rudd know what side of the world he’s living in?

We can all agree that there are parents out there who don’t know how to impose self regulation of their kid’s surfing habits or just let their kids run wild. It would be more cheaper on the public purse for Rudd to spend more money to educate parents on the dangers of the internet & encourage them to watch over their kids &/or install filters on a PC level. You do have to admit that the Howard government almost had the right idea by providing leaflets & filters as part of their ‘NetAlert’ policy.

In order to assure that we do get faster & cheaper net access, we must not let this clean-feed go though. I ask anyone reading this article to you write to your elected official in Parliament House & tell him or her that this clean-feed proposal will not be THE final solution to those net nasties & will make your connection slower & more costly.

We must also discuss with them that clean-feed will erode the right to ‘proper’ free speech online (not this ‘free speech = child porn crap’ that this government is spitting out) & education is the only way to protect our children.

It’s sad that it’s all coming to this.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Chris of the Western SuburbsJan 5, 2008 7:48 PM
The problem could be solved if the government was to set up its own isp, to its own standards. After all, if the government can operate a radio network and a television network, why not an isp? Make it available at a family-friendly price. Maybe the ABC could be given the task of providing oversight and facilities. Then everyone who wants to use it can do so, and those who don’t can go elsewhere in the free market.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Bob from WAJan 6, 2008 12:56 AM
The online sex sites and porn feeds have just got out of control. We are not talking about a few hundred there are millions - it is humanly impossible to prevent them from "breeding" unless of course, the complete internet goes. And that will never happen. (That's akin to adandoning electricity and going back to candles.)
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Like to See It Stopped ... but......Jan 6, 2008 7:48 AM
Senator Conroy is a little disappointing with his suggestion of censorship for the Net. Perhaps a rush of blood to the head was the cause and Kevin should order a cold shower. Honeymoons can be over real quickly.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Sydney LawrenceJan 6, 2008 8:07 AM
What a selfish lot of comments! Sure, there are difficulties, but for the children's sake lets get behind it. And, how many of you are using this filthy stuff anyway? Selfish, thats what I see in you. Just plain selfish.
iTnews - comments icon Posted by M. CookeJan 6, 2008 9:56 AM
Off course some will see it as an attack on their freedom, to do what!
I like how some people get up on their high horse about rights, persons have no rights under the Westminster system except those offered by law.
I can see no reason why the government or any other organisation or person should be ridiculed for trying to facilitate the expectations of our society or trying to bring a sense of control to the internet. Off course some will see it as an attack on their freedom, to do what!
iTnews - comments icon Posted by Tom McHenryJan 8, 2008 6:55 PM
Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 


Tripwire - Click here to win an iTouch





Product Reviews

Star Rating
The AdventNet Manage-Engine Password Manager Pro provides a complete system for password management in one...