McAfee update chaos sparks user fury

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Enterprises offered hotfix, consumers asked to reinstall.

McAfee customers had internet access severed and were left exposed to malware after the company issued a glitched anti-virus update.

The update affected all Windows McAfee suites and VirusScan products including the latest version of VirusScan Enterprise and McAfee Security Center.

Anti-virus signature updates (DAT 6807, 6808) would disable the anti-virus clients, and in some cases sever internet access.

McAfee overnight issued an enterprise 100Mb Super DAT (Hotfix 793640) and a consumer fix (DAT 6809) for the borked updates which it rated as ‘critical’.

Enterprise customers had to apply the hotfix as a product update through the e-policy orchestrator, while consumers were advised to remove McAfee from affected machines and re-install the product in order for the fix to be applied.

Furious enterprise and business customers posted comments yesterday on the McAfee blog claiming they were left high and dry after thousands of machines within their companies were left exposed by the updates.

“I currently have over 3000 endpoints with this problem - solution ASAP please McAfee,” customer Derosa wrote.

Another customer, Bostjanc, said they had 46 of 152 machines affected. “Soo theoretically if one of those users … gets a virus and spreads out to rest of the 45 computers, what then?"

“Then I'm f***ed as an anti-virus technical support.”

Another user had 70 systems of 2100 affected, including two "high profile" users. 

Meanwhile, some consumers took to McAfee’s Facebook account to vent anger where support officers were assisting with technical support.

The borked update followed one issued by McAfee in April that crashed email services, and another by Microsoft for its anti-virus product that flagged Google as hosting the malicious Blackhole exploit kit.

AusCERT security analyst Jonathan Levine said organisations should test antivirus updates before live deployment.

“Everything should be tested before going live as part of best practice,” Levine said.

But he doubted many organisations would bother with testing.

Some users writing on the SANS Internet Storm Center supported the suggestion, saying the cost of testing may outweigh the resources to fix “the occasional glitch”.

Others had comprehensive testing procedures. One McAfee user ran an 18-hour delayed deployment schedule in their organisation in which an evaluation branch would test DAT files on a group of servers and workstations before releasing it to another branch for staggered deployment the next day.

“This has saved us during the bad DAT times … if there is an issue, we are usually only one or two DAT releases behind but catch up during the day,” they said.

Copyright © SC Magazine, Australia


McAfee update chaos sparks user fury
 
 
 
Top Stories
Slow progress in Turnbullistan
[Blog post] How has the NBN moved ahead since regime change?
 
Hacks and frauds can't dampen Bitcoin buzz
[Blog post] Enthusiasts meet in Melbourne.
 
Qantas checks in with cloud computing
Impressed with results of public cloud bake-off.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Have customers that won't pay debts?
Jul 10, 2014
The ACCC and ASIC have updated their advice when it comes to collecting debts.
Carpet cleaner faces court over online testimonials
Jul 4, 2014
The ACCC has initiated proceedings against A Whistle (1979) Pty Ltd, the franchisor of Electrodry...
You can now get 15GB of free online storage using Microsoft OneDrive
Jun 25, 2014
Cloud storage has reached both the capacity and price where it's a viable alternative to local ...
Another clever trick you can perform with Xero
Jun 25, 2014
Here is another way to reach out to particular subsets of your customers using Xero.
Have a phone, tablet and laptop?
Jun 20, 2014
This new Telstra pre-paid 4G mobile hotspot might be useful if you regularly need to use fast ...
Latest Comments
Polls
What is delaying adoption of public cloud in your organisation?







   |   View results
Lock-in concerns
  22%
 
Application integration concerns
  3%
 
Security and compliance concerns
  30%
 
Unreliable network infrastructure
  9%
 
Data sovereignty concerns
  24%
 
Lack of stakeholder support
  4%
 
Protecting on-premise IT jobs
  4%
 
Difficulty transitioning CapEx budget into OpEx
  3%
TOTAL VOTES: 532

Vote