Black hats target small-time Olympic athletes

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Live stream sites phish users.

Poisoning of Olympic-related search engine results has appeared, but big names and events are not the obvious targets.

According to Dave Ewart, director of product marketing EMEA at Blue Coat, black hat hackers have changed their tactics to target lesser known athletes and celebrities and have moved away from big events.

Ewart told SC that while search engine optimisation (SEO) poisoning is still the number one vector for spreading malware, there has been a move away from ‘poisoning' the results of big events to hitting more mundane targets.

“They are hitting a lot more mundane search results and for celebrity searches, they hit more B-listers. This makes sense, as if there is something big happening to an A-lister then it would have less of an impact.”

Hackerts would target ex-Olympic medal winners rather than current high profile athletes because they were not headline news.

“From the research we did, when Steve Jobs died, two per cent of the search results were malicious and when Whitney Houston died in February of this year, the poisoned results began on page 15 of a Google search, so increasingly it is where people are not looking.

“There is no real pattern emerging, but there is a bigger set of search terms around mundane things.”

Research released this week by Trend Micro said that as well as fraudulent websites that claim to sell Olympic tickets, there were a number of fake live streaming sites that appeared in the top search results.

It said that analysis of the sites found that some of these redirected to fake live broadcasts of London Olympics 2012 and contained a link for buying cheap, albeit bogus, tickets, while other fake live streaming sites redirect to another site requiring an email address.

This article originally appeared at scmagazineuk.com

Copyright © SC Magazine, UK edition


Tags
seo
 
 
 
Top Stories
Photos: iTnews Benchmark Awards countdown begins
Just a few days left until entries close for 2014.
 
Australian Govt to rethink cyber security strategy
Six-year old policy to be refreshed.
 
The failure of the antivirus industry
[Blog post] Insights from AVAR 2014.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  15%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  5%
TOTAL VOTES: 1064

Vote