#BlackHat: Researchers upload dangerous app to Google Play store

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Google's Bouncer beat by legit JavaScript trick.

View larger image View larger image View larger image

See all pictures here »

Two researchers demonstrated how they were able to push a malicious information-stealing app onto Google Play, even while Google's Bouncer custom malware scanner is watching.

They circumvented the Bouncer automated scanner with a JavaScript trick that transformed a benign Android app into a malicious one on Google Play.

Black Hat 2012 coverage

Nicholas Percoco and Sean Schulte of Trustwave Spider Labs developed a benevolent app called “SMS Bloxer,” which looked like other SMS blocker apps on the market.

In order to ensure regular users didn't accidentally download the app, Trustwave also priced it at $49.95, in stark contrast to similar apps, which were usually $2 or less, or free.

SMS Bloxer lived on Google Play for two weeks and didn't get flagged by Bouncer for that entire period of time. At its worst, the app was capable of  stealing contacts, SMS messages, and photos.

It could harvest information about the device or force a web page to load, the researchers said. It could also launch a denial-of-service attack.

“Google never flagged it,” Percoco said.

The internet giant, recognising that malicious applications were becoming a growing problem, introduced Bouncer in February.

Google must have realized reacting was a losing battle and some kind of app review was needed, hence Bouncer, Schulte said. There wasn't a lot of information available publicly about the technology or how it worked, which piqued Trustwave's curiosity, Percoco said.

“We wanted to test the bounds of what it's capable of," Percoco said.

The team created a benign app that just reported back to Trustwave whenever it was executed, and made it past Bouncer and onto Google Play. The team had determined Bouncer's IP address by this time, and modified the test app to act maliciously only if it was executed outside Bouncer. 

To avoid detection, the team used  the JavaScript bridge, a “legitimate” workaround supported by Android, Percoco said.

The bridge lets developers remotely add new  features to a program using JavaScript, or changing the look and feel of an app by modifying the HTML, without having to go back through the entire app approval or update process. Facebook and LinkedIn use this method for their apps, Percoco said.

Trustwave used the JavaScript bridge to add increasingly malicious capabilities to the app. Bouncer scanned the app repeatedly, but never noticed the new malicious features. Only when the team tweaked the app to execute every second did Bouncer notice it and suspend the developer account, Percoco said.

Trustwave shared its findings with Google, and Percoco said the company was a “great organization to work with." A Google spokesperson could not be reached for comment by SCMagazine.com.

This article originally appeared at scmagazineus.com

Copyright © SC Magazine, US edition


 
 
 
Top Stories
Can the ATO use IT to shed its old-school reputation?
Inside the ‘reinvention’ at the hands of new management.
 
JB Hi-Fi's new CIO gets 'clean slate' for change
New AusPost, Tabcorp exec to get his hands dirty.
 
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Xero updates Android app
Aug 5, 2015
A new Android version of Xero Touch - the mobile companion app for the Xero cloud accounting ...
The 5 Windows 10 privacy issues you should be aware of
Jul 31, 2015
There are a few unsettling details when it comes to Windows 10 privacy
Windows 10 is here! (For some)
Jul 29, 2015
Delivery of the free upgrade versions of Windows 10 began today - have you got yours yet?
Microsoft reveals Microsoft Send, a new enterprise chat app to rival Slack
Jul 27, 2015
Microsoft Send is MSN Messenger for grownups, and you could be using it at work very soon
Developers offered $500,000 grants to find HoloLens uses
Jul 8, 2015
Can augmented-reality end up in business?
Latest Comments
Polls
Should law enforcement be able to buy and use exploits?



   |   View results
Yes
  14%
 
No
  51%
 
Only in special circumstances
  18%
 
Yes, but with more transparency
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 837

Vote