LinkedIn sprinkles salt after password scare

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Claims no reports of compromised accounts.

LinkedIn has implemented salting capabilities to protect user passwords following news last week that scores of user passwords had been stolen.

While it had "been working around the clock" to add the cryptograhic security measure to new passwords, those which were swiped and later published online were not salted.

Its investigation found that the stolen passwords were not published with corresponding email logins; those members it believed to be at risk had their passwords disabled and were sent an email by its customer service team.

“At this time, there have been no reports of compromised LinkedIn accounts as a result of this password theft. We are continuing to work with law enforcement as they investigate this crime. The health of our network, as measured by member growth and engagement, remains as strong as it was prior to the incident.”

Following the incident, it said that the technology team at LinkedIn has completed a long-planned transition from a password database system that hashed passwords, to a system that both hashes and salts the passwords to provide an extra layer of protection.

“We are profoundly sorry for this incident. Member security is vitally important to us, and transparency is a priority as well. We will provide further updates as warranted by any new developments.”

About four per cent of the emails received by LinkedIn users, or 250,000, were tagged as junk by recipients according to security firm Cloudmark. 

Its spam-filtering system found that a specific signature was assigned to the LinkedIn message, which allowed researchers to estimate how many were marked as spam, leading to users not knowing that they had a compromised password.

"LinkedIn tends to send out a lot of messages that people don't want to read. LinkedIn should be more careful about the general emails that they send to people so users pay attention when the company has something to say,” said Cloudmark researcher Andrew Conway.

This article originally appeared at scmagazineuk.com

Copyright © SC Magazine, UK edition


LinkedIn sprinkles salt after password scare
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1871

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?