Smartphone trial features dueling ex-Sun execs

 

Jonathan Schwartz and Scott McNealy face off.

A pair of former chief executives for what was once a Silicon Valley darling told two different versions of how they viewed their company's legal rights in testimony on Thursday in the trial between Oracle and Google.

Oracle is suing Google in federal court claiming the search engine giant violated its intellectual property rights to the Java programming language and is seeking roughly US$1 billion in copyright damages.

Two years ago Oracle paid about US$7.4 billion to buy Sun Microsystems acquiring Java, the programming which is incorporated in Android smartphone technology, in the takeover.

Jonathan Schwartz, who served as Sun's chief executive officer from 2006 until the sale, testified on behalf of Google that he had never challenged them in court because he did not believe Sun had any grounds for a lawsuit.

But under cross examination, Schwartz acknowledged that his decision was based on business, not legal grounds.

Oracle's attorney Michael Jacobs then asked whether Schwartz was terminated immediately after Sun was sold.

"I believe I resigned," Schwartz said. "They already had a CEO."

Schwartz's predecessor, co-founder and chairman of Sun Microsystems, Scott McNealy, was brought to the stand by Oracle. He testified that a 2007 blog post Schwartz wrote praising Android was not official company policy.

Google's attorney Robert Van Nest then asked McNealy if it was true that he was friends with Oracle co-founder and CEO Larry Ellison.

Asked whether he once said the airport in San Jose, California should be renamed after Ellison, McNealy replied, "I believe so because he's probably largest taxpayer in this geography."

Oracle sued Google in August 2010, saying Google's Android mobile operating system infringes on its intellectual property rights to the Java programming language. Google says it does not violate Oracle's patents and that Oracle cannot copyright certain parts of Java, an "open-source," or publicly available, software language.

The trial, expected to last at least eight weeks, has been divided into three phases: copyright liability, patent claims, and damages. The seven woman, five man jury is expected to begin deliberating on Oracle's copyright claims next week.

The case in US District Court, Northern District of California, is Oracle America, Inc v. Google Inc, 10-3561.

(Reporting By Dan Levine; Editing by Leslie Gevirtz)


Smartphone trial features dueling ex-Sun execs
Eric Schmidt (R), who was Google's CEO for 10 years before assuming the role of executive chairman last year, is pictured in a court sketch being questioned by Oracle lawyer David Boies during a trial over patents involving Java - an ''open-source''
 
 
 
Top Stories
Windows 10 lands in Australia
Campaign to get business to upgrade kicks off.
 
NSW to build its own myGov
Service NSW digital profiles available by September.
 
Android bug leaves a billion phones open to attack
Hackers only need phone number to target devices.
 
 
Eric Schmidt (R), who was Google's CEO for 10 years before assuming the role of executive chairman last year, is pictured in a court sketch being questioned by Oracle lawyer David Boies during a trial over patents involving Java - an ''open-source''
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
The 5 Windows 10 privacy issues you should be aware of
Jul 31, 2015
There are a few unsettling details when it comes to Windows 10 privacy
Windows 10 is here! (For some)
Jul 29, 2015
Delivery of the free upgrade versions of Windows 10 began today - have you got yours yet?
Microsoft reveals Microsoft Send, a new enterprise chat app to rival Slack
Jul 27, 2015
Microsoft Send is MSN Messenger for grownups, and you could be using it at work very soon
Developers offered $500,000 grants to find HoloLens uses
Jul 8, 2015
Can augmented-reality end up in business?
Microsoft Tossup: The planning app for unorganised groups of friends
Jul 8, 2015
App allows friends to research venues, vote on plans and chat. And depending on how you run your ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Should law enforcement be able to buy and use exploits?



   |   View results
Yes
  14%
 
No
  51%
 
Only in special circumstances
  17%
 
Yes, but with more transparency
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 782

Vote