McAfee update glitch kills email servers

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Six products affected.

A glitched update released last week caused McAfee security products to crash, affecting email systems.

The affected update (DAT 66822) was pushed out to corporate customers and affected six McAfee poducts including email and web security, email gateway, and GroupShield.

McAfee said users should not upgrade to the affected DAT file and instead apply the subsequent fixed update (DAT 66823).

Sydney IT administrator Jackie Chen said the error caused his large organisation’s Exchange server to crash.

“The bloody McAfee [sic] caused another trouble yesterday by re-releasing the new DAT 6682,” he said.

“The only thing you can do is to revert the DAT back to 6681 in both ePO master repository and the mail server.”

Another commentator on the SANS Internet Storms Centre said the glitch caused email at US IT services company Axway to jam up.

Axway spammed me all day because of this. It's causing their email security products to fail and queue email,” they said.

Users would need to manually remove large dump files produced when McAfee products including GroupShield and Security for Exchange/Domino and VirusScan crashed.

The glitched update would be resolved in most products by applying automatic updates, however users of McAfee’s ePolicy Orchestrator would need to follow manual remediation steps.

Copyright © SC Magazine, Australia


McAfee update glitch kills email servers
 
 
 
Top Stories
Don’t mention digital disruption to David Whiteing
Buzzwords don’t curry favour with CBA's new CIO - it’s all just innovation to him.
 
Content, cost & constant innovation: How Foxtel plans to take on Netflix
Nell Payne inhabits the “brave new world of blue strings and networking”. Just don't ask her to put a TV screen on your microwave.
 
Westpac fires starting pistol on core banking upgrade
St George readies itself for move to Celeriti.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Should Optus make a bid for iiNet?

   |   View results
Yes
  43%
 
No
  57%
TOTAL VOTES: 565

Vote