Twitter sues five for hawking spam bots

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Spam tools tweeted dodgy links.

Following in the footsteps of other social media giants, Twitter has filed its first-ever lawsuit against individuals and companies who enable spam to spread across the microblogging platform.

The company announced Thursday that it brought a complaint against companies it alleges provides tools that are used to deliver automated spam tweets, which attempt to dupe users into following links that hawk phony goods or distribute malware.

The suits, filed in US District Court in San Francisco, name TweetAttacks, TweetAdder, TweetBuddy, James Lucero of justinlover.info and Garland Harris of troption.com as defendants, according to a Reuters story. None responded to a request for comment, according to the report.

"Our challenge in battling spam is bad actors who build tools designed to distribute spam on Twitter (and the web) by making it easier for other spammers to engage in this annoying and potentially malicious activity," a company blog post said.

"With this suit, we're going straight to the source. By shutting down tool providers, we will prevent other spammers from having these services at their disposal."

The company said it hopes the lawsuits act as a further deterrent to stop dubious tweets from circulating. In addition, Twitter said it has implemented technical safeguards, such as an automatic link shortening service, which checks URLs against a blacklist of potentially malicious sites.

This article originally appeared at scmagazineus.com

Copyright © SC Magazine, US edition


Twitter sues five for hawking spam bots
Tags
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1851

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?