Multiple drive-by attacks detected during February

Powered by SC Magazine
 

More than ten million people were exposed to drive-by download risks in February.

More than ten million people were exposed to drive-by download risks in February.

Research from Barracuda Labs into the world's top 25,000 websites discovered that one popular site will serve malicious content every day, statistically. Its report found that the top-ranked domains served malicious content on all but six days in February, while the top-ranked domains that served malicious content were from 18 different countries.

More than half (54 per cent) of the sites were more than five years old, while 43 per cent were between one to five years old.

Paul Judge, chief research officer at Barracuda Networks, said: “Web security has shifted. If you are a popular website or company, the attackers want access to your users. Good sites gone bad is a serious problem. Users must be careful when visiting even long-time trusted sites; also, more than ever legitimate websites must take steps to protect their websites from compromise.”

This article originally appeared at scmagazineuk.com

Copyright © SC Magazine, UK edition


Tags
 
 
 
Top Stories
Abbott brings back Science minister in cabinet reshuffle
Science tacked onto to Industry title.
 
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1905

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?