Verisign hacked, data stolen

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Security pros detected hacks in 2010, warned execs the following year.

Verisign has admitted it was hacked repeatedly in 2010 and could not pin down what data was stolen.

The company told Reuters it “does not believe” the attacks breached servers that support the Domain Name System (DNS) and the billions of daily web requests it handles, but could not rule out such a compromise. 

The attacks were serious because data stolen from Verisign's DNS could allow attackers to intercept unencrypted communications and redirect traffic to malicious web sites.

Senior Verisign insiders said they were told only an “ugly, slim sliver of facts”, and the company declined multiple interview requests by Reuters.

The breaches were revealed in an October US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing required to be disclosed to investors under US law. Reuters reviewed more than 2000 SEC filings containing information on data breach risks.

Verisign security staff had failed to alert top management of the compromise until September last year, despite quickly reacting to the attack.

Symantec, which bought Verisign's digital certificate arm in early 2010, said there was “no evidence” it was affected by the breach.

Former VeriSign chief technology officer Ken Silva, who held the position for three years to 2010, said he did not know of the attack and added VeriSign "probably can't draw an accurate assessment" of the damage.

Copyright © SC Magazine, Australia


Verisign hacked, data stolen
 
 
 
Top Stories
Five zero-cost ways to improve MySQL performance
How to easily boost MySQL throughput by up to 5x.
 
The big winners from Defence’s back-office IT refresh
Updated: The full list of subcontractors.
 
Tracking the year of CIO churn
[Blog post] Who shone through in 12 months of disruption?
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  69%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  12%
TOTAL VOTES: 989

Vote