US Court forces user to decrypt device

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Requirement can already be imposed on Australian citizens.

Americans could be forced to decrypt encrypted devices for law enforcement agencies following a landmark US Federal Court ruling.

Judge Robert Blackburn ruled Ramona Fricosu must decrypt a PGP-encypted laptop following demands by US authorities, CBSnews reports.

Fricosu was accused of being involved in a mortgage scam.

Judge Blackburn found protections afforded under the US Fifth Amendment – which states a citizen cannot be forced in a criminal case “to be a witness against himself” – would not serve as a defence to prevent police from accessing potential evidence held on laptops.

Prosecutors said they required only that the device be decrypted and did not need the encryption password.

Justice Blackburn said decryption could be ordered under the All Writs Act which has previously required telcos to assist with wiretapping.

The judgment was the latest in a decade-old debate in the US over the lawfulness of forcing users to decrypt devices.

Would it work in Australia?

In Australia, users could be found in contempt of court for refusing to decrypt devices.

“Courts can give the order for users to decrypt devices containing evidence,” Rodney McKemmish, partner at PPB Advisory said.

“If they refuse to hand over the password or provide access, they can be in contempt of court.”

 

Remember to sign up to our daily newsletter to stay connected with the latest news and analysis from Australia and around the world.

 

McKemmish, who has some two decades of experience in digital forensics, said requests to decrypt devices could be made in civil and criminal courts.

But the need to apply for a court order to force the decryption of devices could often be bypassed if a device was seized while it was turned on and in a decrypted state.

Forensics professionals could then create an image of the device for later analysis.

Copyright © SC Magazine, Australia


US Court forces user to decrypt device
 
 
 
Top Stories
Innovating in the sleepy super industry
There’s little incentive to be on the bleeding edge, so why is Andrew Todd fighting so hard?
 
How technology will unify Toll
The systems headache formed through 15 years of acquisitions.
 
Immigration breached Privacy Act with data leak
Pilgrim slams "copy and paste" of asylum seeker data.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  7%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  15%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 810

Vote