Apple jumps to fix developer vulnerabilities

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Group threatened to disclose website holes.

Apple has fixed vulnerabilities on its developer website days after researchers threatened to publish information about the flaw.

The Burma-based YGN hacker group warned Apple about the arbitrary redirect and cross site scripting vulnerabilities on 27 April.

But the holes remained open two months after Apple had received notice and thanked the group.

Apple’s hand was forced after YGN told media outlets it would publicly disclose the findings.

The vulnerability affected all browsers, according to YGN, and could have led to phishing attacks against Apple developers who used the website.

YGN had this year disclosed separate redirect vulnerability information affecting an Oracle website, and a cross site scripting flaw affecting a McAfee site.

The group published information on those flaws after the companies failed to act on security advisories, and the holes were soon fixed.

YGN was established in 2007 as a group dedicated to “ethical hacking and countermeasures”.

Copyright © SC Magazine, Australia


Apple jumps to fix developer vulnerabilities
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1864

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?