RSA to shelve compromised tokens

Powered by SC Magazine
 
You must be a registered member
to access this content.
Registration is FREE.
Please Sign In or Register now.
RSA SecurID tokens are compromised and the company will be forced to replace some of the 40 million tokens in use by customers. The move breaks a stonewall by RSA to rumours that its SecurID system was rendered unsafe after hackers compromised the service in March this year. RSA had previously ...
Please login to view the rest of this article

Login or Register now and get unlimited access.

Already subscribed but have forgotten your login? Reset your password your here.


Why sign up?
  • Unlimited access to iTnews content and take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews.
  • Full use of over 20,000 articles database covering breaking news, video interviews, case studies, research, product reviews and exclusive features with fast and intuitive filtering of results.
  • Daily iTnewswire bulletin delivered direct to your inbox covering the latest industry news from Australia/NZ and around the world.

Register now, its free!
RSA to shelve compromised tokens
Tags
 
 
 
Top Stories
Abbott brings back Science minister in cabinet reshuffle
Science tacked onto to Industry title.
 
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  19%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1912

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?